Comparison Overview

NuMSP

VS

Neusoft

NuMSP

1255 Broad St, None, Clifton, New Jersey, US, 07013
Last Update: 2025-07-26 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

After years providing IT services and security solutions for small and medium (SMB) sized companies across several states, our leadership team decided to offer premium solutions in every state in the US. The SMB market has always provided the majority of job and economic growth in the United States but their ability to rely on technology has always been limited to their own research and knowledge or the reliance on a Trusted IT advisor. At NuMSP, we realize the role of Trusted IT advisor has also become more difficult. The advances in technology and the proliferation of security threats have progressed faster in the last five years than in the prior twenty. Because of that, NuMSP is creating a nationwide company with the scale and resources to deliver advanced services and security solutions that will rival the solutions experienced by Fortune 500 enterprises. We are currently looking to enter new geographic areas and purchase MSPs in our existing markets. If you are interested in selling your MSP and joining a National IT company, please contact us today.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Neusoft

Neusoft Park, No.2, Xinxiu Street Hunnan New District Shenyang, Liaoning 110179, CN
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Neusoft provides innovative information technology – enabled solutions and services to meet the demands arising from social transformation, to shape new life styles for individuals and to create values for the society. Focusing on software technology, Neusoft provides industrial solutions, smart connected products, platform products and cloud and data services. Founded in 1991, Neusoft is the first listed software company in China and the first CMM5 and CMMI(V1.2) 5 certified Chinese software company. Today, Neusoft has nearly 20,000 employees worldwide, and it has established 8 regional headquarters, 10 software R&D bases, 16 software development and technical support centers, and a marketing and service network covering more than 60 cities in China. It has also set up subsidiaries outside China in the United States, Japan, Europe, the Middle East, and South America. 东软是中国最大的IT解决方案与服务供应商,我们为客户提供行业解决方案和产品工程解决方案以及相关产品与服务。我们的愿景是致力于成为最受社会、客户、股东和员工尊敬的公司,我们的目标是成为全球优秀的IT解决方案与服务供应商。 东软为目标明确、富有才华的人提供了驰骋的天地,我们重视每个员工的发展,并建立了一种多元化、致力于企业和员工共同成长的企业文化。我们的人才观是:尊重人才、发展人才。 东软真诚欢迎您的加入,在这里我们会通过成长性的薪金和福利、员工持股计划、导师制完美的培训等制度的实施使这一理念成为现实。

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/numsp.jpeg
NuMSP
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neusoft.jpeg
Neusoft
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
NuMSP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Neusoft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NuMSP in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neusoft in 2025.

Incident History — NuMSP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NuMSP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Neusoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neusoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/numsp.jpeg
NuMSP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neusoft.jpeg
Neusoft
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both NuMSP company and Neusoft company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Neusoft company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NuMSP company.

In the current year, Neusoft company and NuMSP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Neusoft company nor NuMSP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Neusoft company nor NuMSP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Neusoft company nor NuMSP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NuMSP company nor Neusoft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NuMSP company nor Neusoft company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NuMSP company employs more people globally than Neusoft company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in LaChatterie Verger up to 1.2.10. This impacts the function redirectToAuthorization of the file /src/main/services/mcp/oauth/provider.ts. The manipulation of the argument URL results in deserialization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeriaWei ZKEACMS up to 4.3. This affects the function Delete of the file src/ZKEACMS.Redirection/Controllers/UrlRedirectionController.cs of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: fix invalid free of JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap in diUnmount syzbot found an invalid-free in diUnmount: BUG: KASAN: double-free in slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] BUG: KASAN: double-free in __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 Free of addr ffff88806f410000 by task syz-executor131/3632 CPU: 0 PID: 3632 Comm: syz-executor131 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller-00012-gca57f02295f1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x74/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:284 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report_invalid_free+0xac/0xd0 mm/kasan/report.c:460 ____kasan_slab_free+0xfb/0x120 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:177 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1724 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x12e/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1750 slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 diUnmount+0xef/0x100 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:195 jfs_umount+0x108/0x370 fs/jfs/jfs_umount.c:63 jfs_put_super+0x86/0x190 fs/jfs/super.c:194 generic_shutdown_super+0x130/0x310 fs/super.c:492 kill_block_super+0x79/0xd0 fs/super.c:1428 deactivate_locked_super+0xa7/0xf0 fs/super.c:332 cleanup_mnt+0x494/0x520 fs/namespace.c:1186 task_work_run+0x243/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:179 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x664/0x2070 kernel/exit.c:820 do_group_exit+0x1fd/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:950 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:961 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:959 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3b/0x40 kernel/exit.c:959 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [...] JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap is not setting to NULL after free in diUnmount. If jfs_remount() free JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap but then failed at diMount(). JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap will be freed once again. Fix this problem by setting JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap to NULL after free.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition System crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause of the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue up twice. Here's the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to double queue for deletion on different cpu. 20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 Move the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/ksm: fix race with VMA iteration and mm_struct teardown exit_mmap() will tear down the VMAs and maple tree with the mmap_lock held in write mode. Ensure that the maple tree is still valid by checking ksm_test_exit() after taking the mmap_lock in read mode, but before the for_each_vma() iterator dereferences a destroyed maple tree. Since the maple tree is destroyed, the flags telling lockdep to check an external lock has been cleared. Skip the for_each_vma() iterator to avoid dereferencing a maple tree without the external lock flag, which would create a lockdep warning.