Comparison Overview

Nuanxin-Health

VS

Canadian Psychological Association

Nuanxin-Health

Qinghuatongfang Technology Square, East Building, Block D, Beijing, 100084, CN
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Nuanxin-Health is a startup group initiated in 2015, working with applying various technical support in mental health care. Our slogon is "May the doctors easier, may the patients happier"​. We are running the first online mental health hospital in China by cooperating with Guizhou 2rd Provincial People's Hospital. Currently we focus on improving the efficiency of the current treatments. 1. finding the potential mental health threats for different enterprise 2. improving efficiency of communication between doctors and patients by vedio/audio/im chats 3. tracking the treatment and recovery after leaving the hospital by regular feedbacks, patients'​ online(app) behavior and the intelligent hardwares. We welcome different talents and technical cooperations from all areas to help us shoot our aims.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Canadian Psychological Association

141 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, K1P 5J3, CA
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

The Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) is the national association for the science, practice and education of psychology in Canada. With over 7,000 members and affiliates, the CPA is Canada's largest association for psychology. Its objectives are: - to improve the health and welfare of all Canadians; - to promote excellence and innovation in psychological research, education, and practice; - to promote the advancement, development, dissemination, and application of psychological knowledge; and - to provide high quality services to members. Some of the CPA’s most important functions include: Promoting a standard set of ethical principles that govern the work of Canadian psychologists through the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists. Providing accreditation for professional training programs in psychology. Publishing scientific journals to disseminate the latest findings from psychology researchers in Canada and beyond. Organizing an annual convention that brings together psychologists from across the country. Advocating for the psychological needs of Canadians Consulting to and working with stakeholders (e.g. government, other health disciplines and professions, consumers of health care) to identify and address needs, gaps, and opportunities for Canada's health and mental health.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nuanxin-health.jpeg
Nuanxin-Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-psychological-association.jpeg
Canadian Psychological Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nuanxin-Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Canadian Psychological Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nuanxin-Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canadian Psychological Association in 2026.

Incident History — Nuanxin-Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nuanxin-Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Canadian Psychological Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian Psychological Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nuanxin-health.jpeg
Nuanxin-Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-psychological-association.jpeg
Canadian Psychological Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nuanxin-Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canadian Psychological Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Canadian Psychological Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nuanxin-Health company.

In the current year, Canadian Psychological Association company and Nuanxin-Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Canadian Psychological Association company nor Nuanxin-Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Canadian Psychological Association company nor Nuanxin-Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Canadian Psychological Association company nor Nuanxin-Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nuanxin-Health company nor Canadian Psychological Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nuanxin-Health nor Canadian Psychological Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nuanxin-Health company nor Canadian Psychological Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Nuanxin-Health nor Canadian Psychological Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nuanxin-Health nor Canadian Psychological Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nuanxin-Health nor Canadian Psychological Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nuanxin-Health nor Canadian Psychological Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nuanxin-Health nor Canadian Psychological Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nuanxin-Health nor Canadian Psychological Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N