Comparison Overview

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

VS

Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE3 3XT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Please note, this page is no longer active; you can now find us on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/company/cntw/. In October 2019, NHS mental health and disability services in North Cumbria transferred to be run our Trust, and we therefore changed our name to Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (CNTW) to reflect this. For our latest news and career opportunities, please visit our new LinkedIn page under the CNTW name.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 531
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center

2431 Jones Bend Rd, Louisville, 37777, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Specifically designed for youth between the ages of 13 and 17, The Village Behavioral Health offers a variety of services that can help adolescents heal from mental health disorders, behavioral concerns, and addiction-related issues in Louisville, Tennessee. With a team of dedicated, multidisciplinary professionals, The Village offers the following life-changing services to young people who need therapeutic support: - Structured residential treatment for youth grappling with mental illness and behavioral issues - Supportive substance abuse residential treatment - Invaluable and accredited educational services via The Village Academy These treatment options feature a diverse range of effective methods of care that are proven to help young people thrive and reach their treatment and educational goals. From individual therapy and various group therapy opportunities, to beneficial and supervised medication management services and other research-based interventions, young people are afforded every advantage to becoming well again. At The Village, each youth receives customized care in an atmosphere that is nurturing and conducive to truly lasting healing and recovery. These treatment modalities provide a diverse range of effective methods of care that are proven to help young people thrive and reach their treatment and educational goals.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 86
Subsidiaries: 71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntwnhs.jpeg
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/village-behavioral-health-treatment-center.jpeg
Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center in 2026.

Incident History — Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntwnhs.jpeg
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/village-behavioral-health-treatment-center.jpeg
Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company has not reported any.

In the current year, Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company nor Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company nor Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company.

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company employs more people globally than Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor Village Behavioral Health Treatment Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N