Comparison Overview

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

VS

NELFT Careers

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE3 3XT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cntw.nhs.uk

Please note, this page is no longer active; you can now find us on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/company/cntw/. In October 2019, NHS mental health and disability services in North Cumbria transferred to be run our Trust, and we therefore changed our name to Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (CNTW) to reflect this. For our latest news and career opportunities, please visit our new LinkedIn page under the CNTW name.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 531
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NELFT Careers

CEME, Marsh way , Rainham, Essex, UK, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.careers.nelft.nhs.uk/

We are North East London Foundation NHS Foundation Trust. We provide mental health and community services for 4.9 million people living in North East London, Essex, Kent and Medway. We employ 7,500 staff across 200 services and work in hospitals, health centres, GP practices and people’s homes. We know that our staff are our greatest asset, that’s why we prioritise wellbeing support and offer flexible and hybrid working. Career progression, development opportunities, and world class training are all part of the package at NELFT. With a just and compassionate culture at the heart of everything we do, we’re committed to creating an environment where our people feel valued and supported to bring their authentic self to work. If you want to make a difference to people’s lives, join NELFT today.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntwnhs.jpeg
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelft-careers.jpeg
NELFT Careers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NELFT Careers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NELFT Careers in 2026.

Incident History — Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NELFT Careers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NELFT Careers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntwnhs.jpeg
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelft-careers.jpeg
NELFT Careers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NELFT Careers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NELFT Careers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company.

In the current year, NELFT Careers company and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NELFT Careers company nor Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NELFT Careers company nor Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NELFT Careers company nor Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company nor NELFT Careers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor NELFT Careers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NELFT Careers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust company.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor NELFT Careers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor NELFT Careers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor NELFT Careers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor NELFT Careers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor NELFT Careers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust nor NELFT Careers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References