Comparison Overview

NTT DATA

VS

Inetum

NTT DATA

Toyosu Center Building,, 3-3, Toyosu 3-chome, Koto-ku, Tokyo, JP, 135-6033
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

NTT DATA – a part of NTT Group – IT and business services headquartered in Tokyo. We help clients transform through consulting, industry solutions, business process services, digital & IT modernization and managed services. NTT DATA enables them, as well as society, to move confidently into the digital future. We are committed to our clients’ long-term success and combine global reach with local client attention to serve them in over 50 countries around the globe.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 41,195
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Inetum

5, Rue Touzet Gaillard, St.-Ouen, Île-de-France, FR, 93400
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Inetum is a European leader in digital services. Inetum’s team of 27,000 consultants and specialists strive every day to make a digital impact for businesses, public sector entities and society. Inetum’s solutions aim at contributing to its clients’ performance and innovation as well as the common good. Present in 19 countries with a dense network of sites, Inetum partners with major software publishers to meet the challenges of digital transformation with proximity and flexibility. Driven by its ambition for growth and scale, Inetum generated sales of 2.4 billion euros in 2024. 🏅 Top Employer Europe 2025

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,633
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nttdata.jpeg
NTT DATA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NTT DATA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inetum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DATA in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inetum in 2025.

Incident History — NTT DATA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DATA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inetum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inetum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nttdata.jpeg
NTT DATA
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploiting exposed/hard-coded credentials in cloud/source code repositories (AWS, Bitbucket, GitHub), Insider-assisted access, Weak network segmentation, Third-party vendor compromises (e.g., TMS, WMS, EDI systems), Staged data leaks for extortion pressure
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion), Reputational Damage, Operational Disruption (via data leaks)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NTT DATA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Inetum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NTT DATA and Inetum have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Inetum company and NTT DATA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Inetum company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while NTT DATA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Inetum company nor NTT DATA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

NTT DATA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Inetum company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NTT DATA company nor Inetum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NTT DATA nor Inetum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Inetum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NTT DATA company.

NTT DATA company employs more people globally than Inetum company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither NTT DATA nor Inetum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NTT DATA nor Inetum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NTT DATA nor Inetum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NTT DATA nor Inetum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NTT DATA nor Inetum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NTT DATA nor Inetum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X