Comparison Overview

NSW Office of Local Government

VS

Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis

NSW Office of Local Government

Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

The Office of Local Government (OLG) is the NSW Government agency responsible for strengthening the sustainability, performance, integrity, transparency and accountability of the local government sector. OLG has a policy, legislative, investigative and program focus in regulating the State’s 128 local councils. The agency also works collaboratively with the local government sector to support local councils to deliver for their local communities. OLG, which is part of the Department of Planning and Environment, is the key adviser to the NSW Government on local government matters.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis

Autopista Serranías Puntanas KM 783 San Luis, San Luis 5700, AR
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis. Cuando se produjo la Revolución de Mayo de 1810, el cabildo de San Luis, fue el primero en adherir a la Primera Junta de Gobierno Porteña. Tres años más tarde, en noviembre de 1813, por decreto del gobierno de las Provincias Unidas del Río de la Plata, Mendoza, San Juan y San Luis pasaron a conformar la provincia de Cuyo, con capital en Mendoza.

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nswolg.jpeg
NSW Office of Local Government
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gobierno-de-la-provincia-de-san-luis.jpeg
Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NSW Office of Local Government
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NSW Office of Local Government in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis in 2025.

Incident History — NSW Office of Local Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NSW Office of Local Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nswolg.jpeg
NSW Office of Local Government
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Exposure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gobierno-de-la-provincia-de-san-luis.jpeg
Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NSW Office of Local Government company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NSW Office of Local Government company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company and NSW Office of Local Government company have not reported any cyber incidents.

NSW Office of Local Government company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NSW Office of Local Government company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NSW Office of Local Government company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government company nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NSW Office of Local Government company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company.

Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis company employs more people globally than NSW Office of Local Government company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NSW Office of Local Government nor Gobierno de la Provincia de San Luis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H