Comparison Overview

NSD Labelling

VS

Infopress Group

NSD Labelling

Strickledeweg 52-54, Rotterdam, 3044 EK, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nsd-labelling.com/en

With a history of over 150 years, NSD Labelling has deep expertise in manufacturing custom designed, premium labels. We serve our 5,000 customers in 20 countries with premium quality multi-layer labels, luxury embellished labels, HACCP food safety labels and labelling solutions. In our production facilities in the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Czech Republic we employ the latest flexographic, screen and digital printing equipment, along with a wide range of embellishment techniques. Visit our website for more information.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Infopress Group

Strada Digului, Odorheiu Secuiesc, 535600, RO
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.infopressgroup.com

Infopress Group was founded in 1990 as the printer of the local newspaper in Odorheiu Secuiesc. In the years to have come IPG becomes a modern printing house specialized in high circulation catalogs and also magazines. In 1994, in the purpose of consolidating the commercial relations on the catalogs market we opened a new office in Bucharest. Four years later, in 1998, our constant efforts brought us to a well deserved reward, becoming the Romanian market leader, position hold to this day. As of 2001 we have continuously invested in modernization; we've bought the best machines and equipments, we have extended our production capabilities by acquiring and implementing the latest information management and pre-press. All this, together with the extension of our facilities with a new 4000 m2 production hall, transforms Infopress Group into an important company of the South - East European printing industry. In 2007 and 2008 we upgraded our technology, keeping in this way our leader position on the local market, for both the quality and the volume of the prints. In May 2010 the company of private equity GED acquired 92% of the capital of Infopress Group. GED is a European Private Equity firm operating in the small buyout and growth capital segment in the southeast Europe and the Iberian Peninsula, managing a total fund of investments of around € 350 million. With this acquisition, GED increases up to eight portfolio companies in Eastern Europe.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsd-international.jpeg
NSD Labelling
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infopress-group.jpeg
Infopress Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NSD Labelling
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infopress Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NSD Labelling in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infopress Group in 2025.

Incident History — NSD Labelling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NSD Labelling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infopress Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infopress Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsd-international.jpeg
NSD Labelling
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infopress-group.jpeg
Infopress Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Infopress Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NSD Labelling company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Infopress Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NSD Labelling company.

In the current year, Infopress Group company and NSD Labelling company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Infopress Group company nor NSD Labelling company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Infopress Group company nor NSD Labelling company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Infopress Group company nor NSD Labelling company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NSD Labelling company nor Infopress Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NSD Labelling nor Infopress Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NSD Labelling company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Infopress Group company.

NSD Labelling company employs more people globally than Infopress Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither NSD Labelling nor Infopress Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NSD Labelling nor Infopress Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NSD Labelling nor Infopress Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NSD Labelling nor Infopress Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NSD Labelling nor Infopress Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NSD Labelling nor Infopress Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References