Comparison Overview

NSA

VS

General Dynamics Information Technology

NSA

Kjelsåsveien 168, Oslo, Oslo, 0411, NO
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nsa.no

NSA is a Nordic IT-consultant- and system operations company. The company also deliver training. NSA has its head quarter in Oslo and other offices in Grimstad, Kristiansand and Rjukan, all Norway, as well as Kolkata, India. NSA was established in 1995. Solution areas: - Business Intelligence/Datawarehouse - Case Management - Content Management - Portals - Process/Integration/Architecture NSA delivers advise, implementation and service management with unique competence on Oracles and Red Hats applications and technologies.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 1,118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

General Dynamics Information Technology

undefined, Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gdit.com

GDIT is a global technology and professional services company that delivers solutions, technology and mission services to every major agency across the U.S. government, defense and intelligence community. Our 30,000 experts extract the power of technology to create immediate value and deliver solutions at the edge of innovation. We operate across 50+ countries worldwide, offering leading capabilities in digital modernization, AI/ML, Cloud, Cyber and application development. GDIT is part of General Dynamics, a global aerospace and defense company. We have shared our clients’ sense of purpose for over half a century and have a have a unique understanding of their missions, complex environments, and a rapidly changing world. Together with our clients, we strive to create a safer, smarter world by harnessing the power of deep expertise and advanced technology.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 25,548
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsa.jpeg
NSA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics-information-technology.jpeg
General Dynamics Information Technology
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NSA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
General Dynamics Information Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NSA in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Dynamics Information Technology in 2025.

Incident History — NSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — General Dynamics Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Dynamics Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsa.jpeg
NSA
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Whistleblowing, Transparency
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics-information-technology.jpeg
General Dynamics Information Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

General Dynamics Information Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NSA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NSA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas General Dynamics Information Technology company has not reported any.

In the current year, General Dynamics Information Technology company and NSA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology company nor NSA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NSA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other General Dynamics Information Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology company nor NSA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NSA company nor General Dynamics Information Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NSA nor General Dynamics Information Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NSA company nor General Dynamics Information Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

General Dynamics Information Technology company employs more people globally than NSA company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither NSA nor General Dynamics Information Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NSA nor General Dynamics Information Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NSA nor General Dynamics Information Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NSA nor General Dynamics Information Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NSA nor General Dynamics Information Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NSA nor General Dynamics Information Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References