Comparison Overview

NPS Media Group

VS

Good Ground Press

NPS Media Group

2 Corporate Drive, Shelton, CT, 06484, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

NPS Media Group (formerly National Publisher Services), is the premier magazine circulation and newsstand outsourcing firm in the U.S. and has been serving the publishing industry for more than 25 years. NPS acquired leading circulation outsource firm, Circulation Specialists, in 2011. NPS Digital Group is a subset of NPS Media Group, offering digital services to publishing companies and niche brands. NPS Digital Group specializes in SEO, email marketing, paid media, web development, and consulting services. Our core business is circulation management and audience development. We focus on customer acquisition and retention, fulfillment management, business modeling, strategic planning, print and digital direct response marketing, single-copy sales at retail and list services. We have expertise working with both consumer magazines (and newsletters) as well as business-to-business titles.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Good Ground Press

1884 Randolph Avenue, St. Paul, MN, 55105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

What We Do: Good Ground Press is the publishing ministry of the Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet. Good Ground Press publishes resources for living the Gospel today, including weekly lectionary-based programs "Sunday By Sunday" for adults and "SPIRIT" for teens. Our Mission: Good Ground Press publishes gospel-centered Catholic resources to draw people in to reflecting together, opening their faith lives to nourish one another, and sustaining one another in their commitments to the gospel work of mercy and justice.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nps-media-group.jpeg
NPS Media Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/good-ground-press.jpeg
Good Ground Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NPS Media Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Good Ground Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NPS Media Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Good Ground Press in 2025.

Incident History — NPS Media Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NPS Media Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Good Ground Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Good Ground Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nps-media-group.jpeg
NPS Media Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/good-ground-press.jpeg
Good Ground Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Good Ground Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NPS Media Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Good Ground Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NPS Media Group company.

In the current year, Good Ground Press company and NPS Media Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Good Ground Press company nor NPS Media Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Good Ground Press company nor NPS Media Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Good Ground Press company nor NPS Media Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NPS Media Group company nor Good Ground Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NPS Media Group nor Good Ground Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NPS Media Group company nor Good Ground Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NPS Media Group company employs more people globally than Good Ground Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither NPS Media Group nor Good Ground Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NPS Media Group nor Good Ground Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NPS Media Group nor Good Ground Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NPS Media Group nor Good Ground Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NPS Media Group nor Good Ground Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NPS Media Group nor Good Ground Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.