Comparison Overview

Novograf

VS

Royal Printing

Novograf

10 Langlands Place, East Kilbride, undefined, G75 0YF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

We are the UK's leading edge custom surface specialists. Through 35 years of innovative design and servicing expertise, we consistently challenge the creative potential of graphics to deliver brilliant brand experiences. We provide custom solutions for every surface imaginable, from floors to doors, tables to walls, bricks, tiles, lifts, escalators, counters and checkouts. We offer a range of bespoke faux bricks, wood, tiles, slate and more—tailored to your needs. Our signage solutions are as diverse as our graphics, offering wayfinder signage, 3D signage, fret cut letters, neons and digital screens. Suppliers to leading companies for over 35 years, our experience covers retail, hospitality, leisure, workspace and more! Trusted by the biggest names in the country – our clients have included Co-op, Sainsbury's, Aldi, William Hill, Greggs, Natwest, M&S, Waitrose, Iceland, JTI, WH Smith, Accor Hotels, Travelodge and First Group Rail. Working towards a greener future, Novograf has been an eco-friendly pioneer in the printing industry. Striving for best in class, we prioritise waste reduction from order raising to completed installation.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Royal Printing

2615 Ellington Rd., Quincy, IL, US, 62305
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Royal Printing is a full service commercial printing company. We print everything from letterheads and envelopes to books and full color magazines. Have a different shaped project, no problem. Royal can custom design, die cut and finish and project to meet your needs. Being located in the midwest provides easy access to anywhere in the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novograf.jpeg
Novograf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing.jpeg
Royal Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Novograf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Novograf in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Novograf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novograf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novograf.jpeg
Novograf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing.jpeg
Royal Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Novograf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Novograf company.

In the current year, Royal Printing company and Novograf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Printing company nor Novograf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Printing company nor Novograf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Printing company nor Novograf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Novograf company nor Royal Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Novograf nor Royal Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Novograf company nor Royal Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Printing company employs more people globally than Novograf company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Novograf nor Royal Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Novograf nor Royal Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Novograf nor Royal Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Novograf nor Royal Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Novograf nor Royal Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Novograf nor Royal Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N