Comparison Overview

Novick Law PLLC

VS

Pump Court Chambers

Novick Law PLLC

1033 Demonbreun St, Nashville, Tennessee, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

A boutique entertainment, business, and intellectual property-focused law practice based in Nashville, TN. Licensed to practice law in California, New York and Tennessee, Daniel Novick represents entertainment and entrepreneurial clients worldwide in matters related to business development, trademark registration and protection, copyright catalog sales and acquisitions, and contract negotiations – with a particular focus on music, digital media, and technology. Clients include Grammy-nominated artists with millions of records sold, cutting-edge start-ups, and established businesses with track records going back decades.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pump Court Chambers

3 Pump Court, London, EC4Y 7AJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Pump Court Chambers is a barristers’ set fit for the modern business world. As a large provider of legal services, Pump Court Chambers is recognised as a ‘Leading Set’ by Chambers and Partners Guide to the UK Legal Profession, and is highly regarded by its peers for the depth of its expertise across the full range of contentious legal services - from consumer, to general commercial (including regulatory), landlord & tenant, employment, family & probate – plus a number of more specialist areas in between. Pump Court Chambers is a leading dynamic set of barristers with more than 90 members.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novick-law-pllc.jpeg
Novick Law PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pump-court-chambers.jpeg
Pump Court Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Novick Law PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pump Court Chambers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Novick Law PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pump Court Chambers in 2025.

Incident History — Novick Law PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novick Law PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pump Court Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pump Court Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novick-law-pllc.jpeg
Novick Law PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pump-court-chambers.jpeg
Pump Court Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Novick Law PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pump Court Chambers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pump Court Chambers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Novick Law PLLC company.

In the current year, Pump Court Chambers company and Novick Law PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pump Court Chambers company nor Novick Law PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pump Court Chambers company nor Novick Law PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pump Court Chambers company nor Novick Law PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Novick Law PLLC company nor Pump Court Chambers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Novick Law PLLC nor Pump Court Chambers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Novick Law PLLC company nor Pump Court Chambers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pump Court Chambers company employs more people globally than Novick Law PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Novick Law PLLC nor Pump Court Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Novick Law PLLC nor Pump Court Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Novick Law PLLC nor Pump Court Chambers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Novick Law PLLC nor Pump Court Chambers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Novick Law PLLC nor Pump Court Chambers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Novick Law PLLC nor Pump Court Chambers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X