Comparison Overview

Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C.

VS

ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited

Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C.

733 Yonkers Ave, Yonkers, 10704-2635, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz, P. C. is among the largest law firms in Westchester County and is one of the leading law firms in the New York metropolitan area concentrating in all aspects of real estate law. Our attorneys have extensive experience in real estate, including landlord-tenant litigation, transactional real estate and foreclosures. We are among recognized authorities in the laws involving regulated housing such as the Rent Stabilization Law. Our firm’s attorneys are frequently invited to various conferences to share their knowledge and experience. With offices at 733 Yonkers Avenue, Yonkers, we are centrally located to the courts of New York City, as well as Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester and Rockland counties. Our specially designed computer system allows us to handle litigation quickly and efficiently and allows our clients to track the progress of their cases online twenty-four hours a day through the internet with CASETRACKLIVE, while our skilled and attentive support staff assists in providing our clients with superior service. Our practice, which encompasses the entire City of New York and neighboring counties, is focused primarily on transactional real estate, preparation of mortgages and commercial leases, federal real estate property seizures, foreclosures, landlord-tenant matters, and litigation involving complex real estate issues. Our practice also includes bankruptcy proceedings. Our clients include some of New York City’s leading real estate companies and major financial institutions, as well as many individuals and small property owners. In addition, we serve as consultants to numerous New York City law firms on matters relating to real estate litigation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited

3 The Oak Tree, Elmhurst Business Park, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8EX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

UK Wide Fixed Fee specialist Process Serving company offering outstanding levels of personal service for all documents requiring personal or hand delivery. Operating throughout the UK since 2003 we have a wealth of experience in serving documents, specialising in volume instructions at a cost effective rate. Fixed Fee service is available throughout England and Wales. Our bespoke in-house case management system enables us to tailor our service to your exact requirements, ensuring all instructions are dealt with efficiently, and with a tenacity simply not seen in other firms. Based in Lichfield, Staffordshire, we are well appointed to deal with your process serving instructions, wherever you have them. For more information, please contact Nicola Ashby on 01543 888434, [email protected] or visit our website www.ashprocess.co.uk.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novick-edelstein-lubell.jpeg
Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ash-uk-process-servers-limited.jpeg
ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novick-edelstein-lubell.jpeg
Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ash-uk-process-servers-limited.jpeg
ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company.

In the current year, ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company and Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company nor Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company nor Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company nor Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. company employs more people globally than ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Novick, Edelstein, Pomerantz P.C. nor ASH (UK) Process Servers Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X