Comparison Overview

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

VS

MSC Cruises

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

7665 Corporate Center Drive, Miami, FL, US, 33126
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NCLH) is a leading global cruise company which operates Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With a combined fleet of 32 ships and approximately 66,500 berths, NCLH offers itineraries to approximately 700 destinations worldwide. NCLH expects to add 13 additional ships across its three brands through 2036, which will add approximately 41,000 berths to its fleet.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 16,771
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MSC Cruises

Avenue Eugene Pittard, Geneva, Geneva, 1206, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, MSC Cruises is the world’s third largest cruise lines and the market leader in Europe, South America, the Middle East and Southern Africa, with a strong and growing presence in North America and the Far East. The MSC Cruises fleet consists of 22 modern ships with three new vessels due to be launched in 2025, 2026, and 2027. The Company operates in more than 100 countries around the world, offering cruises across five continents, calling at more than 240 destinations and welcoming more than 180 different nationalities on board. MSC Cruises is firmly committed to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions for its marine operations by 2050.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 16,009
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norwegian-cruise-line-holdings.jpeg
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-cruises.jpeg
MSC Cruises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MSC Cruises
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSC Cruises in 2025.

Incident History — Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MSC Cruises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSC Cruises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norwegian-cruise-line-holdings.jpeg
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-cruises.jpeg
MSC Cruises
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company and MSC Cruises company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, MSC Cruises company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company.

In the current year, MSC Cruises company and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MSC Cruises company nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MSC Cruises company nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MSC Cruises company nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company nor MSC Cruises company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. nor MSC Cruises holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company nor MSC Cruises company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company employs more people globally than MSC Cruises company, reflecting its scale as a Travel Arrangements.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. nor MSC Cruises holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. nor MSC Cruises holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. nor MSC Cruises holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. nor MSC Cruises holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. nor MSC Cruises holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. nor MSC Cruises holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H