Comparison Overview

Norwalk Furniture

VS

FOB

Norwalk Furniture

100 Furniture Pkwy, None, Norwalk, Ohio, US, 44857
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Norwalk Furniture Company proudly manufactures high-quality custom upholstery in Norwalk, Ohio. Located halfway between Detroit and Cleveland on Lake Erie, we benefit from a tradition of family farming and manufacturing that has long supported the automobile and related industries. We are people who like to “make things” and we are especially proud to be a part of the current “maker movement” in America. Our long tradition of handcrafting fine custom upholstery began when the founders, the Gerken family, newly arrived from Germany, began to upholster buggy seats for carriages 117 years ago. In 2008, the fourth generation of the family decided to close the company. But, twelve community-minded families banded together to buy the facility in order to keep jobs in our town. Today, we operate in a “mid-century” modern 440,000 square foot factory that employs 225 craftspeople, many of whom are second and third-generation artisans. This team creates over 40,000 pieces each year, one at a time, by hand, with each piece built to the specifications of our dealer partners for their customers.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FOB

9364 Old Bailes Rd, Fort Mill, 29707, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

FOB sources furniture and customizes furniture for the multi-housing industry, especially student housing.Founded in 2003 and based in Fort Mill SC, FOB serves all regions of the nation. Its core business is designing furniture specific to a company’s needs, then fulfilling the goods direct from international sources where there’s no middle man. FOB then delivers these custom, high-quality furnishings on-time, everytime.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norwalk-furniture-corporation.jpeg
Norwalk Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fob.jpeg
FOB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Norwalk Furniture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FOB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norwalk Furniture in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOB in 2025.

Incident History — Norwalk Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norwalk Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FOB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norwalk-furniture-corporation.jpeg
Norwalk Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fob.jpeg
FOB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FOB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Norwalk Furniture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FOB company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Norwalk Furniture company.

In the current year, FOB company and Norwalk Furniture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FOB company nor Norwalk Furniture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FOB company nor Norwalk Furniture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FOB company nor Norwalk Furniture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Norwalk Furniture company nor FOB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Norwalk Furniture nor FOB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Norwalk Furniture company nor FOB company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FOB company employs more people globally than Norwalk Furniture company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Norwalk Furniture nor FOB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Norwalk Furniture nor FOB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Norwalk Furniture nor FOB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Norwalk Furniture nor FOB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Norwalk Furniture nor FOB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Norwalk Furniture nor FOB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.