Comparison Overview

Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission

VS

Pacific Strategies

Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission

312 Main Street, Towanda, Pennsylvania, 18848, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

To help businesses expand their markets, generate employment, improve the local economy and plan for the future development of the Northern Tier Region. NTRPDC is an equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. Bonnie Warner, NT Workforce Development (WIOA) Equal Opportunity Officer [email protected] NTRPDC 312 Main Street Towanda, PA 18848 570-265-9103 or toll-free 888-868-8800 TDD/TTY PA Relay 711 Equal Opportunity is the Law: https://www.northerntier.org/upload/EO%20is%20the%20Law%20Poster--English.pdf Igualdad De Oportunidad es la Lay: https://www.northerntier.org/upload/EO%20is%20the%20Law%20Poster--Spanish.pdf

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pacific Strategies

None
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Orange County-based public affairs consultancy specializing in strategic communications, social media, government relations, community outreach strategies and opinion management. Our principals bring many years senior-level public affairs experience, garnered in both the private and public sectors, working with organizations and individuals at the national, state and local level. Clients benefit from sound strategic counsel and support to guide them successfully through the public policy arena. We help local governments build modern, transparent public communications infrastructure that take full advantage of powerful social media tools -- enabling them to engage in productive, positive communication with constituents, as well as internally. Our current and past clients include: Irvine Ranch Water District, the City of Anaheim, the Orange County Transportation Authority, the City of Westminster, the Children and Families Commission of Orange County and the Orange County District Attorney’s office.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-tier-regional-planning-&-development-commission.jpeg
Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pacific Strategies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Strategies in 2025.

Incident History — Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pacific Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-tier-regional-planning-&-development-commission.jpeg
Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-strategies.jpeg
Pacific Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pacific Strategies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pacific Strategies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company.

In the current year, Pacific Strategies company and Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pacific Strategies company nor Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company nor Pacific Strategies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission nor Pacific Strategies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company nor Pacific Strategies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission company employs more people globally than Pacific Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission nor Pacific Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission nor Pacific Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission nor Pacific Strategies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission nor Pacific Strategies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission nor Pacific Strategies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Northern Tier Regional Planning & Development Commission nor Pacific Strategies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L