Comparison Overview

Northern Engraving

VS

KNP

Northern Engraving

803 South Black River Street, Sparta, 54656, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Nameplates, overlays, decorative trim, appliance panels, and dials. Each of these can be one of the last things considered when designing a product. Yet, each is important to brand recognition and product differentiation. 100 years of connecting brands with decorative solutions has taught us a few things. We know how to take your message to the next level and give you identification that demands a second look. Hundreds of OEM designers trust their brand with us. Collaborate with us on your next project. Let us help create your identity solution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 199
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KNP

Lamdin Road, None, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, GB, IP32 6NU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Today more than ever, print is key in engaging targeted audiences who find it easy to ignore digital communications. From beautifully crafted Direct Mail pieces to brochures, magazines, invitations, prospectuses and vouchers, print is integral to business. At KNP we’ve spent over 30 years helping clients reach their target audiences through integrated printing and mailing solutions. We understand the importance of getting something ‘just right’. And we know you need a print partner you can trust, so we deliver what we say we will, when we say we will, and how we say we will. Always on hand to give advice and deliver the right solution, we’ve built a reputation for outstanding quality and reliability. And with everything on site, we provide a cost-effective, no hidden extras solution. Our services: Litho & Digital Print, Direct Mail, Specialised Finishing, Large Format, Signage. Say hello! 01284 715296 knplitho.co.uk

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-engraving.jpeg
Northern Engraving
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knp-litho.jpeg
KNP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Northern Engraving
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KNP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northern Engraving in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

KNP has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Northern Engraving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northern Engraving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KNP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KNP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-engraving.jpeg
Northern Engraving
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/knp-litho.jpeg
KNP
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Weak/Compromised Password, Social Engineering (Blagging/Tricking IT Helpdesk - in case of M&S)
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom demand)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Northern Engraving company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KNP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KNP company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Northern Engraving company has not reported any.

In the current year, KNP company has reported more cyber incidents than Northern Engraving company.

KNP company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Northern Engraving company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither KNP company nor Northern Engraving company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KNP company nor Northern Engraving company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Northern Engraving company nor KNP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Northern Engraving nor KNP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Northern Engraving company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KNP company.

Northern Engraving company employs more people globally than KNP company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Northern Engraving nor KNP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Northern Engraving nor KNP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Northern Engraving nor KNP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Northern Engraving nor KNP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Northern Engraving nor KNP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Northern Engraving nor KNP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L