Comparison Overview

North Star Planning

VS

Center for Community Progress

North Star Planning

49 Pineland Dr, New Gloucester Hall, Suite 102, New Gloucester, Maine, US, 04260
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We're a small Maine based consulting planning firm focusing on good planning process and the ultimate ability to implement planning work. North Star Planning aims to meet both of these goals through these guiding principles: The process should be inclusive The products should be accessible The plan should be specific The progress should be measurable

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Community Progress

1001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Center for Community Progress is the only national organization dedicated to the revitalization of vacant properties. We help meet the growing need in America's cities and towns for effective, sustainable solutions to turn vacant, abandoned and problem properties into vibrant places. Our work includes policy development, technical assistance and capacity building, research, advocacy, and network building. We also host the Reclaiming Vacant Properties Conference, bringing together hundreds of practitioners and policy makers to learn cutting edge strategies to revitalize vacant, abandoned, and problem properties.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-star-planning.jpeg
North Star Planning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-community-progress.jpeg
Center for Community Progress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North Star Planning
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Community Progress
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Star Planning in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Community Progress in 2025.

Incident History — North Star Planning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Star Planning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Community Progress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Community Progress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-star-planning.jpeg
North Star Planning
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-community-progress.jpeg
Center for Community Progress
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both North Star Planning company and Center for Community Progress company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Center for Community Progress company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to North Star Planning company.

In the current year, Center for Community Progress company and North Star Planning company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Community Progress company nor North Star Planning company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Community Progress company nor North Star Planning company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Community Progress company nor North Star Planning company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither North Star Planning company nor Center for Community Progress company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North Star Planning nor Center for Community Progress holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither North Star Planning company nor Center for Community Progress company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Community Progress company employs more people globally than North Star Planning company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither North Star Planning nor Center for Community Progress holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North Star Planning nor Center for Community Progress holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North Star Planning nor Center for Community Progress holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North Star Planning nor Center for Community Progress holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North Star Planning nor Center for Community Progress holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North Star Planning nor Center for Community Progress holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H