Comparison Overview

North Mississippi State Hospital

VS

North Texas Behavioral Health Authority

North Mississippi State Hospital

38804, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Mississippi State Legislature through House Bill 960 passed in its 1995 session the enabling legislation authorizing the construction of a regional psychiatric hospital. The 50-bed acute care facility, located in Tupelo, Mississippi, offers treatment and services for mentally ill adult men and women in the northeastern portion of the state. North Mississippi State Hospital is the eleventh facility in the Department of Mental Health, joining five regional centers for individuals with developmental disabilities, one juvenile rehabilitation center, three other psychiatric hospitals, and a residential center for the mentally ill. The State of Mississippi through the Department of Mental Health is seeking to offer a continuum of services for the mentally ill within the patient's region of residence. This closer proximity will allow family, friends, and community to more actively support the treatment, recovery, and aftercare of the patient. North Mississippi State Hospital opened in April 1999. The hospital is located on the corner of Eason Boulevard and Briar Ridge Road and employs approximately 120 people. A groundbreaking ceremony was held on Thursday, December 19, 1996, signifying the first state-run psychiatric hospital to be established in Mississippi in more than a century. The patient's length of stay is intended to be 14-21 days. Emphasis is placed on a total continuum of care, including pre-admission, inpatient, aftercare, and crisis intervention. It is our goal to be a part of the community mental healthcare system and to work cooperatively with other service providers in positively influencing outcomes and the overall care of our patients.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

North Texas Behavioral Health Authority

8111 LBJ Fwy W, Dallas, 75251, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

The North Texas Behavioral Health Authority (NTBHA) is the Texas state-designated Local Behavioral Health Authority (LBHA) for the counties of Dallas, Ellis, Hunt, Kaufman, Navarro, and Rockwall. NTBHA was created to be a safety net for our behavioral health system of care, which encompasses mental health and substance use for persons eligible for Medicaid and/or public behavioral health funds, and mental health crisis services within our six-county region. We accomplish this by contracting with various mental health and substance use services providers throughout our region to ensure individual choice of provider. NTBHA received its Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) certification in partnership with Child and Family Guidance Center, Homeward Bound, and Southern Area Behavioral Healthcare, which ensures a holistic, "no wrong door" approach to providing accessible, high-quality, recovery-oriented services. NTBHA is committed to providing quality behavioral health services for individuals, regardless of their ability to pay, place of residence, and/or their experience with homelessness. We will reduce or waive fees for those experiencing financial hardship using the sliding fee discount schedule provided by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. NTBHA seeks to develop a collaborative system of care for individuals experiencing mental illness and/or substance use disorders. Collaborative Responsibility is the belief that the public healthcare system, which serves a community, is the responsibility of that community.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
North Mississippi State Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntbha6.jpeg
North Texas Behavioral Health Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North Mississippi State Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
North Texas Behavioral Health Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Mississippi State Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Texas Behavioral Health Authority in 2026.

Incident History — North Mississippi State Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Mississippi State Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — North Texas Behavioral Health Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Texas Behavioral Health Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
North Mississippi State Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntbha6.jpeg
North Texas Behavioral Health Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

North Mississippi State Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to North Mississippi State Hospital company.

In the current year, North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company and North Mississippi State Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company nor North Mississippi State Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company nor North Mississippi State Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company nor North Mississippi State Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital company nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital company nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

North Texas Behavioral Health Authority company employs more people globally than North Mississippi State Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North Mississippi State Hospital nor North Texas Behavioral Health Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N