Comparison Overview

North Jersey Recovery Center

VS

A Better Way

North Jersey Recovery Center

22-08 Route 208, Suite 2, Fair Lawn, NJ, US, 07410
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The staff here at North Jersey Recovery Center understands that addiction is a disease which manifests in mental, physical, and spiritual anguish. Regardless of the places that addiction has taken you, our addiction specialists can help you heal. Our specialized North Jersey addiction treatment programs set an industry-standard using innovative drug and alcohol programming. Our vision is to provide each and every client with the tools needed for a lifetime of lasting, meaningful sobriety.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A Better Way

Last Update: 2026-01-21

I believe most behavioral problems (those not biologically caused) result from attempting to solve life problems with methods that eventually make things worse. I see my clients solving their problems better, becoming freer and happier, as they learn to listen to themselves and to those around them. I work with adults with problems with depression, anxiety, relationship difficulties, substance abuse, gambling and other compulsive behavior. Together, we find solutions that work. I approach problems with a combination of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, interpersonal therapy and solutions-based therapy. Therapy is work, working smarter not harder, at making changes. Depression and anxiety can be helped greatly with listening and with changes in thinking, acting and lifestyle, with or without medication. I provide chemical dependency evaluations and Level 1 treatment, including for DUI. I conduct a low-cost group for problem gamblers, sponsored by the MT Council on Problem Gambling. I have more than 30 years experience, with almost 20 years in private practice.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-jersey-recovery-center.jpeg
North Jersey Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-better-way.jpeg
A Better Way
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North Jersey Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A Better Way
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Jersey Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Better Way in 2026.

Incident History — North Jersey Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Jersey Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A Better Way (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Better Way cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-jersey-recovery-center.jpeg
North Jersey Recovery Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-better-way.jpeg
A Better Way
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A Better Way company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North Jersey Recovery Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A Better Way company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to North Jersey Recovery Center company.

In the current year, A Better Way company and North Jersey Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A Better Way company nor North Jersey Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A Better Way company nor North Jersey Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A Better Way company nor North Jersey Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center company nor A Better Way company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center nor A Better Way holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center company nor A Better Way company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

North Jersey Recovery Center company employs more people globally than A Better Way company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center nor A Better Way holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center nor A Better Way holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center nor A Better Way holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center nor A Better Way holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center nor A Better Way holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North Jersey Recovery Center nor A Better Way holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N