Comparison Overview

North Coast Law

VS

Sipara

North Coast Law

7 Margaret Street, Palmwoods, Queensland, 4555, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Simple, practical legal solutions. North Coast Law is an innovative Sunshine Coast law firm offering a wide variety of legal services including family law & divorce, wills & estate planning, deceased estates, leasing, subdivisions, commercial & residential conveyancing. With four Sunshine Coast offices at Palmwoods, Pomona, Beerwah & Birtinya we are conveniently located to service your legal needs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sipara

Third Floor, Seacourt Tower, Oxford, undefined, OX2 0JJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are Sipara, intellectual property (IP) law specialists, helping our clients to protect and maximise the potential of their IP rights. We have the expertise to provide a complete IP service to our clients, and help with IP strategy, managing IP portfolios, introducing new products, extending brands and dealing in IP. Sipara launched to the market in November 2010 in order to make high-end IP legal services accessible to the wider market. We are proud to work with some high profile national and international brands, and our clients tell us we are a refreshing and welcomed business partner. Our team of solicitors, trade mark attorneys and dedicated paralegals provide an effective blend of expertise and experience to help clients capture, protect, derive value from, enforce and manage their IP assets. Oxford: Third Floor, Seacourt Tower, West Way, Oxford, OX2 0JJ T: +44 (0)844 225 3570 E: [email protected] London: 180 Piccadilly, London, W1D 7DH T: +44 (0)844 225 3570 E: [email protected]

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-coast-law.jpeg
North Coast Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sipara.jpeg
Sipara
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North Coast Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sipara
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Coast Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sipara in 2025.

Incident History — North Coast Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Coast Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sipara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sipara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-coast-law.jpeg
North Coast Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sipara.jpeg
Sipara
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

North Coast Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sipara company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sipara company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to North Coast Law company.

In the current year, Sipara company and North Coast Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sipara company nor North Coast Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sipara company nor North Coast Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sipara company nor North Coast Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither North Coast Law company nor Sipara company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North Coast Law nor Sipara holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither North Coast Law company nor Sipara company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sipara company employs more people globally than North Coast Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither North Coast Law nor Sipara holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North Coast Law nor Sipara holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North Coast Law nor Sipara holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North Coast Law nor Sipara holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North Coast Law nor Sipara holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North Coast Law nor Sipara holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X