Comparison Overview

North Carolina State University

VS

University of Sydney

North Carolina State University

20 Watauga Club Dr, Raleigh, North Carolina, US, 27607
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 800 and 849

With more than 34,000 students and 7,000 faculty and staff, North Carolina State University is a comprehensive university known for its leadership in education and research, and globally recognized for its science, technology, engineering and mathematics leadership. NC State students, faculty and staff are focused. As one of the leading land-grant institutions in the nation, NC State is committed to playing an active and vital role in improving the quality of life for the citizens of North Carolina, the nation and the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 20,639
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Sydney

Camperdown/Darlington, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2006
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

As the first university to be established in Australasia, the University of Sydney consistently ranks as one of Australia’s top universities. We aim to create and sustain a university that will, for the benefit of both Australia and the wider world, maximise the potential of the brightest researchers and most promising students, whatever their social or cultural background. Web: sydney.edu.au Explore Sydney through the eyes of a student in 360° on our Virtual Tour: sydney.edu.au/tour Twitter: twitter.com/Sydney_Uni Facebook: facebook.com/sydneyuni Instagram: @sydney_uni YouTube: youtube.com/uniofsydney CRICOS: 00026A TEQSA: PRV12057

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 19,624
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-carolina-state-university.jpeg
North Carolina State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-sydney.jpeg
University of Sydney
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North Carolina State University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Sydney
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Carolina State University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Sydney in 2026.

Incident History — North Carolina State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Carolina State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Sydney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Sydney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-carolina-state-university.jpeg
North Carolina State University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-sydney.jpeg
University of Sydney
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Sydney company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North Carolina State University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Sydney company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to North Carolina State University company.

In the current year, University of Sydney company and North Carolina State University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Sydney company nor North Carolina State University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Sydney company nor North Carolina State University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Sydney company nor North Carolina State University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither North Carolina State University company nor University of Sydney company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North Carolina State University nor University of Sydney holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Sydney company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to North Carolina State University company.

North Carolina State University company employs more people globally than University of Sydney company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither North Carolina State University nor University of Sydney holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North Carolina State University nor University of Sydney holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North Carolina State University nor University of Sydney holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North Carolina State University nor University of Sydney holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North Carolina State University nor University of Sydney holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North Carolina State University nor University of Sydney holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.