Comparison Overview

North America Intellectual Property

VS

The Holmes Law Firm

North America Intellectual Property

5F., No.389, Fuhe Rd., 234, Taiwan (R.O.C.), New Taipei City, Taiwan, 23450, TW
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since its founding in 1995, Taipei-based North America Intellectual Property (NAIP) Corporation has gained a reputation for service innovation and stringent quality standards in the field of patent prosecution. With steadfast dedication to clients and unfailing emphasis on professionalism, NAIP has grown to over 210 employees and is now among the largest patent prosecution firms in Taiwan. Founder: Winston Hsu, US Patent Agent Location: Yonghe District, New Taipei City, Taiwan Employees: 210+ Patent Engineers: 62 US Patent Agents: 2 European Patent Attorney / CIPA Associate: 1 TW Patent Agents / Attorneys: 8 Percent of US Applications Filed Online: 100 To contact a sales representative call: 00886 (0) 289237350 #1305

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Holmes Law Firm

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Duties and responsibilities: Supporting service procurement and service provider negotiations; assisting with executing a strategy to market the firm's services; managing client relations; organizing and overseeing advertising campaigns; organizing and administering special events; creating protocols to describe business processes and practices; assisting with implementing cost-reducing practices in day-to-day business administration; creating and conducting service user satisfaction surveys, performance metrics.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-america-intellectual-property-corporation.jpeg
North America Intellectual Property
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-holmes-law-firm.jpeg
The Holmes Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North America Intellectual Property
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Holmes Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North America Intellectual Property in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Holmes Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — North America Intellectual Property (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North America Intellectual Property cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Holmes Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Holmes Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-america-intellectual-property-corporation.jpeg
North America Intellectual Property
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-holmes-law-firm.jpeg
The Holmes Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Holmes Law Firm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North America Intellectual Property company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Holmes Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to North America Intellectual Property company.

In the current year, The Holmes Law Firm company and North America Intellectual Property company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Holmes Law Firm company nor North America Intellectual Property company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Holmes Law Firm company nor North America Intellectual Property company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Holmes Law Firm company nor North America Intellectual Property company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither North America Intellectual Property company nor The Holmes Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North America Intellectual Property nor The Holmes Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither North America Intellectual Property company nor The Holmes Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

North America Intellectual Property company employs more people globally than The Holmes Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither North America Intellectual Property nor The Holmes Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North America Intellectual Property nor The Holmes Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North America Intellectual Property nor The Holmes Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North America Intellectual Property nor The Holmes Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North America Intellectual Property nor The Holmes Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North America Intellectual Property nor The Holmes Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X