Comparison Overview

Norsk Tipping

VS

Atrient

Norsk Tipping

Måsåbekkveien 20, 2325 Hamar, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gi drømmen en sjanse (18+) Norsk Tipping gir drømmen en sjanse, enten det er for den som har spilt eller alle de som hver dag nyter godt av tjenester og anlegg som er finansiert gjennom spillemidlene. Vi er 400 ansatte som leverer drøm, spenning og underholdning innenfor ansvarlige rammer. Vi er alltid på jakt etter nye talenter som kan være med å utvikle fremtidens Norsk Tipping. Følg med her! Har spill blitt et problem? Kontakt: Hjelpelinjen.no

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 266
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atrient

815 E. Pilot Rd., Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gaming operators are recognizing the importance of leveraging technology across their enterprise. They seek solutions that create operational efficiencies, differentiate their property, and drive revenue; they are relying on information technology that improves their overall operating performance. Atrient helps our Gaming clients develop a solid technology-driven roadmap to accomplish these goals. Atrient offers custom developed software solutions and also has a suite of applications developed exclusively for Gaming Operators. Atrient’s Gaming Practice has a specialized team that understands the unique needs of the everchanging industry. In addition to our suite of applications, Atrient can also leverage its industry expertise to develop custom software applications to meet your needs.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norsk-tipping.jpeg
Norsk Tipping
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrient-inc..jpeg
Atrient
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Norsk Tipping
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atrient
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norsk Tipping in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atrient in 2025.

Incident History — Norsk Tipping (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norsk Tipping cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atrient (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atrient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norsk-tipping.jpeg
Norsk Tipping
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atrient-inc..jpeg
Atrient
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Norsk Tipping company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atrient company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Atrient company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Norsk Tipping company.

In the current year, Atrient company and Norsk Tipping company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atrient company nor Norsk Tipping company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atrient company nor Norsk Tipping company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atrient company nor Norsk Tipping company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Norsk Tipping company nor Atrient company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Norsk Tipping nor Atrient holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Norsk Tipping company nor Atrient company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Norsk Tipping company employs more people globally than Atrient company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Norsk Tipping nor Atrient holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Norsk Tipping nor Atrient holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Norsk Tipping nor Atrient holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Norsk Tipping nor Atrient holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Norsk Tipping nor Atrient holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Norsk Tipping nor Atrient holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H