Comparison Overview

Norred Law

VS

Law Council of Australia

Norred Law

515 E Border St, Arlington, Texas, 76010, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

As a full-service law firm providing commercial litigation, corporate, real estate, intellectual property, and bankruptcy services, Norred Law helps clients navigate complex legal processes. Whether you need help structuring your business, closing a commercial transaction, filing for bankruptcy, facing a lawsuit, or applying for a patent, Norred Law can help you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Law Council of Australia

Level 1, MODE3, 24 Lonsdale Street, Braddon, ACT, 2612, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Law Council of Australia represents more than 104,000 Australian legal professionals through its constituent member bar associations, law societies and Law Firms Australia, on national and international issues, and promotes the administration of justice, access to justice and general improvement of the law. The Law Council also represents the Australian legal profession overseas, and maintains close relationships with legal professional bodies throughout the world. Individual membership is available to the Law Council’s specialist Sections, including Business Law, Family Law, Federal Dispute Resolution, International Law and Legal Practice. Legal professionals are encouraged to join a Law Council Section today to: • build a network of professional contacts in your field of practice; • be part of a strong national voice on topical legal issues; • free subscriptions to Law Council publications; • professional development opportunities; and • exclusive corporate and multiple membership discounts. Apply for membership today: https://www.lawcouncil.au/membership

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norred-law-pllc.jpeg
Norred Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-council-of-australia.jpeg
Law Council of Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Norred Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Law Council of Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norred Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Council of Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Norred Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norred Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Law Council of Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Council of Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norred-law-pllc.jpeg
Norred Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-council-of-australia.jpeg
Law Council of Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Law Council of Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Norred Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Law Council of Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Norred Law company.

In the current year, Law Council of Australia company and Norred Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Law Council of Australia company nor Norred Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Law Council of Australia company nor Norred Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Law Council of Australia company nor Norred Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Norred Law company nor Law Council of Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Norred Law nor Law Council of Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Norred Law company nor Law Council of Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law Council of Australia company employs more people globally than Norred Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Norred Law nor Law Council of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Norred Law nor Law Council of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Norred Law nor Law Council of Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Norred Law nor Law Council of Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Norred Law nor Law Council of Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Norred Law nor Law Council of Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X