Comparison Overview

NoRedInk

VS

Learning Journals Ltd

NoRedInk

undefined, San Francisco, California , 94104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

NoRedInk’s mission is to help all students harness the power of the written word, and we currently help students in over 60% of US school districts become better writers. Our adaptive writing curriculum engages students with exercises based on their interests, guides them through the writing process with instructional support, and boosts their skills through targeted practice. To date, learners have completed over 10 billion writing exercises on our site. Founded by a high school English teacher, NoRedInk is led by an experienced team of educators, technologists, and language evangelists. We’re backed by top-tier investors, including Susquehanna Growth Equity, True Ventures, ReThink Education, Google Ventures, and GSV. Check out our 2021 coverage in Business Wire, earlier articles about us in The Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and Forbes, or our founder’s 2-minute pitch on NBC when first launching the company in 2012. We are a team of 155 people with a deep commitment to unlocking every writer’s potential. We are a fully remote team with a strong culture. Check out our current openings at: https://www.noredink.com/jobs

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Learning Journals Ltd

Codebase, 38 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh, EH3 9DZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Learning Journals is the original and simple e-learning journals solution used by 100's of nurseries and 1000's of children and their parents. The system was developed by an award winning Nursery and was designed to make the jobs of Teachers and Nursery practitioners easier. Outlined below are some of the main features of Learning Journals: Record children's observations Link these to specific Learning Outcomes for any curriculum e.g. EYFS, CFE etc Evidence these by uploading pictures and videos Plan and assess development with our comprehensive built in tracking system Create reports Allow parents to participate in their child's learning journey from home, work or anywhere in the world Try learning Journals for free- https://www.learningjournals.co.uk/free-trial/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/noredink.jpeg
NoRedInk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-journals-ltd.jpeg
Learning Journals Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NoRedInk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Learning Journals Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NoRedInk in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Learning Journals Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — NoRedInk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NoRedInk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Learning Journals Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Learning Journals Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/noredink.jpeg
NoRedInk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-journals-ltd.jpeg
Learning Journals Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NoRedInk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Learning Journals Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Learning Journals Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NoRedInk company.

In the current year, Learning Journals Ltd company and NoRedInk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Learning Journals Ltd company nor NoRedInk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Learning Journals Ltd company nor NoRedInk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Learning Journals Ltd company nor NoRedInk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NoRedInk company nor Learning Journals Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NoRedInk nor Learning Journals Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NoRedInk company nor Learning Journals Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NoRedInk company employs more people globally than Learning Journals Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither NoRedInk nor Learning Journals Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NoRedInk nor Learning Journals Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NoRedInk nor Learning Journals Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NoRedInk nor Learning Journals Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NoRedInk nor Learning Journals Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NoRedInk nor Learning Journals Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X