Comparison Overview

NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD

VS

Grupo Bimbo

NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD

None, None, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Founded in 1996, Nongfu Spring is China's largest packaging water supplier, holding the number one spot for market share and is one of the top 20 beverage companies in China.In terms of retail sales in 2019, Nongfu Spring ranks among the top three in the Chinese market for tea beverages, functional beverages and juice beverages. Since its foundation, Nongfu Spring has strictly adhered to a "natural and healthy" philosophy, never using tap water and never adding artificial minerals to its drinking water. In order to ensure a continuous supply of high-quality natural water, Nongfu Spring has a unique strategic vision and prospectively lays out twelve scarce high-quality natural water sources in China, laying the foundation and ability to provide consumers with long-term natural health services and form long-term Stable competitive advantage. Nongfu Spring remains true to original aspiration, focuses on the future, to create a Chinese beverage super brand.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grupo Bimbo

Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

NOURISHING A BETTER WORLD With more than 148,000 associates in 34 countries , we are the biggest bakery in the world! At Grupo Bimbo we are committed to work in a sustainable way for a better world and to generate economic development in 4 continents. We strive to improve the lifestyle of the communities where we have presence and to become good neighbors. We are investing in technology and innovation to reduce our environmental footprint. *We value the person and foster a diversity and inclusion culture. *We operate in a responsible, efficient, productive and humane way, taking care of our environment. *We offer options for everyone and we promote healthy lifestyles.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 37,849
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nongfu-spring-co.-ltd.jpeg
NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupobimbo.jpeg
Grupo Bimbo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grupo Bimbo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Bimbo in 2025.

Incident History — NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grupo Bimbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Bimbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nongfu-spring-co.-ltd.jpeg
NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupobimbo.jpeg
Grupo Bimbo
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grupo Bimbo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Grupo Bimbo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company has not reported any.

In the current year, Grupo Bimbo company and NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grupo Bimbo company nor NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Grupo Bimbo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Grupo Bimbo company nor NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company nor Grupo Bimbo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD nor Grupo Bimbo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Grupo Bimbo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company.

Grupo Bimbo company employs more people globally than NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD nor Grupo Bimbo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD nor Grupo Bimbo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD nor Grupo Bimbo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD nor Grupo Bimbo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD nor Grupo Bimbo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NONGFU SPRING CO.,LTD nor Grupo Bimbo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H