Comparison Overview

Noma Security

VS

CrowdStrike

Noma Security

New York, 10002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://noma.security

Noma Security is the agentic AI security platform giving enterprise organizations the confidence to rapidly build AI applications and adopt AI agents at scale. Noma Security uniquely provides cybersecurity teams with control of AI risk through continuous AI discovery and inventory, AI supply chain security, AI red teaming, and AI runtime protection to ensure compliance and risk mitigation. Backed by Ballistic Ventures, Glilot Capital, Cyber Club London, Databricks Ventures and SVCI, Noma Security is widely adopted by Fortune 500 customers and has been recognized by Gartner as a leading AI TRiSM solution.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 86
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

CrowdStrike

Remote, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crowdstrike.com

CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-class AI, the CrowdStrike Falcon® platform leverages real-time indicators of attack, threat intelligence, evolving adversary tradecraft and enriched telemetry from across the enterprise to deliver hyper-accurate detections, automated protection and remediation, elite threat hunting and prioritized observability of vulnerabilities. Purpose-built in the cloud with a single lightweight-agent architecture, the Falcon platform delivers rapid and scalable deployment, superior protection and performance, reduced complexity and immediate time-to-value. CrowdStrike: We stop breaches.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,400
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/noma-security.jpeg
Noma Security
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Noma Security
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CrowdStrike
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

Noma Security has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

CrowdStrike has 515.38% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Noma Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Noma Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CrowdStrike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CrowdStrike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/noma-security.jpeg
Noma Security
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious instructions embedded in Google Workspace documents (Google Docs, Gmail, Google Calendar)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Malicious Employee), Social Engineering (Voice-Phishing), Credential Theft (SSO Authentication Cookies), Dark Web/Telegram Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Reputation Damage, Data Theft for Resale
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: compromised npm packages, malicious dependency injection, post-install script execution
Motivation: credential harvesting, unauthorized access, potential follow-on attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Process Suspension
Motivation: Bypass Detection Mechanisms
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CrowdStrike company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Noma Security company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CrowdStrike company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Noma Security company.

In the current year, CrowdStrike company has reported more cyber incidents than Noma Security company.

Neither CrowdStrike company nor Noma Security company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

CrowdStrike company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Noma Security company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CrowdStrike company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Noma Security company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Noma Security company and CrowdStrike company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Noma Security nor CrowdStrike holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Noma Security company nor CrowdStrike company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CrowdStrike company employs more people globally than Noma Security company, reflecting its scale as a Computer and Network Security.

Neither Noma Security nor CrowdStrike holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Noma Security nor CrowdStrike holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Noma Security nor CrowdStrike holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Noma Security nor CrowdStrike holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Noma Security nor CrowdStrike holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Noma Security nor CrowdStrike holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References