Comparison Overview

Natalie Kitamura Design

VS

The Point Collective

Natalie Kitamura Design

1001 Bridgeway, Suite C3 Sausalito, CA 94965, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

NKD is a graphic design firm with loyal clients since 1991. What differentiates NKD from other graphic design services? It’s great service, great design, great staff and small firm prices with big firm results. Clients such as Aspen Skiing Company (Aspen, CO) and Harry & David, have worked with Natalie Kitamura Design for over two decades. That’s right, NKD has been working with some of the most demanding clients for over 20 years plus. NKD’s client list includes Aspen Skiing Company, Climateworks Foundation Harry & David, Limelight Hotels, Proofpoint as well as numerous small businesses and non-profits including the Zellerbach Foundation, Foster America, California Children's Trust, and the San Francisco Community Health Center. NKD focuses on print collateral, web design, ad (digital and print, logos and corporate identity, direct mail, packaging and specialty design services. NKD is a woman owned, minority owned California business.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Point Collective

1248 Sierra Mar, San Jose, CA, 95118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

We are a women founded multidisciplinary graphic design and marketing collective. And we are so much more. Because you are so much more. By focusing on where creativity and strategy meet, we are able to offer solutions that transcend problems big and small. We have roots in the Bay Area and on the Central Coast of California but serve clients worldwide. Our clients span many industries and range from tiny to enterprise, but they all have one thing in common — they do incredible things.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Natalie Kitamura Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-point-collective.jpeg
The Point Collective
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Natalie Kitamura Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Point Collective
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natalie Kitamura Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Point Collective in 2025.

Incident History — Natalie Kitamura Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natalie Kitamura Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Point Collective (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Point Collective cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Natalie Kitamura Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-point-collective.jpeg
The Point Collective
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natalie Kitamura Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Point Collective company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Point Collective company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Natalie Kitamura Design company.

In the current year, The Point Collective company and Natalie Kitamura Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Point Collective company nor Natalie Kitamura Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Point Collective company nor Natalie Kitamura Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Point Collective company nor Natalie Kitamura Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design company nor The Point Collective company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design nor The Point Collective holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design company nor The Point Collective company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design nor The Point Collective holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design nor The Point Collective holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design nor The Point Collective holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design nor The Point Collective holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design nor The Point Collective holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Natalie Kitamura Design nor The Point Collective holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X