Comparison Overview

Nitz Photography

VS

Andy Batt Studio

Nitz Photography

undefined, undefined, undefined, 32092, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Nitz Photography is a home based custom portrait studio specializing in maternity, newborn, baby and children. Our focus is to capture the true essence and personality of each and every child that we photograph, to help you capture those little things that mean so much to you and your family.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Andy Batt Studio

undefined, Portland, Oregon, 97211, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 700 and 749

Andy Batt Studio, llc. was founded by photographer Andy Batt and producer Therese Gietler. Located in Portland, Oregon, Andy Batt Studio provides photography and cinematography services to the advertising, marketing, design and digital marketing industry. The areas of expertise include: athletes; celebrity athletes; sports marketing; editorial portraiture; music, dance and entertainment industries; & conceptual narrative projects.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nitz-photography.jpeg
Nitz Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andybattstudio.jpeg
Andy Batt Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nitz Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Andy Batt Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nitz Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andy Batt Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Nitz Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nitz Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Andy Batt Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andy Batt Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nitz-photography.jpeg
Nitz Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andybattstudio.jpeg
Andy Batt Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nitz Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Andy Batt Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Andy Batt Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nitz Photography company.

In the current year, Andy Batt Studio company and Nitz Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Andy Batt Studio company nor Nitz Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Andy Batt Studio company nor Nitz Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Andy Batt Studio company nor Nitz Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nitz Photography company nor Andy Batt Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nitz Photography nor Andy Batt Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Andy Batt Studio company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nitz Photography company.

Both Nitz Photography company and Andy Batt Studio company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Nitz Photography nor Andy Batt Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nitz Photography nor Andy Batt Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nitz Photography nor Andy Batt Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nitz Photography nor Andy Batt Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nitz Photography nor Andy Batt Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nitz Photography nor Andy Batt Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N