Comparison Overview

Niskanen Center

VS

Transparency International Georgia

Niskanen Center

820 1st Street NE, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.niskanencenter.org

Established in 2014, the Niskanen Center is a nonpartisan think tank that works to change public policy through direct engagement in the policymaking process: developing and promoting proposals to legislative and executive branch policymakers, building coalitions to facilitate joint action, and marshaling the most convincing arguments in support of our agenda. The Center’s main audience is the Washington insiders – policy-oriented legislators, presidential appointees, career civil servants in planning, evaluation and budget offices, congressional committee staff, engaged academics, and interest group analysts – who together decide the pace and direction of policy change. Follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/NiskanenCenter Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/niskanencenter/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Transparency International Georgia

61, Agmashenebeli Ave, Tbilisi, GE, 0102
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749
http://transparency.ge/en

Transparency International Georgia (TI Georgia) is a local non-governmental organization committed to combating corruption in Georgia through the promotion of transparency and accountability. Our mission is to serve as the primary source of information on corruption reform in Georgia, to assist the government and the broader public in facilitating reform in sectors where corruption exists, to build and strengthen institutions and to promote good governance. In recent years, TI Georgia has become Georgia's leading advocacy-based think tank. TI Georgia is a member of the Transparency International (TI) movement, the only global non-governmental organization devoted to combating corruption. It brings together civil society, business, and governments in a powerful global coalition. TI, through its International Secretariat and more than 90 independent national chapters around the world, works to stem both the supply and demand of corruption at the local, national, and international levels.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transparency-international-georgia.jpeg
Transparency International Georgia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Niskanen Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transparency International Georgia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niskanen Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transparency International Georgia in 2025.

Incident History — Niskanen Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niskanen Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transparency International Georgia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transparency International Georgia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transparency-international-georgia.jpeg
Transparency International Georgia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Niskanen Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transparency International Georgia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Transparency International Georgia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Niskanen Center company.

In the current year, Transparency International Georgia company and Niskanen Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor Transparency International Georgia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Transparency International Georgia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor Transparency International Georgia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Niskanen Center company employs more people globally than Transparency International Georgia company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Transparency International Georgia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Transparency International Georgia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Transparency International Georgia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Transparency International Georgia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Transparency International Georgia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Transparency International Georgia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References