Comparison Overview

Niskanen Center

VS

The Institute of Public Affairs

Niskanen Center

820 1st Street NE, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.niskanencenter.org

Established in 2014, the Niskanen Center is a nonpartisan think tank that works to change public policy through direct engagement in the policymaking process: developing and promoting proposals to legislative and executive branch policymakers, building coalitions to facilitate joint action, and marshaling the most convincing arguments in support of our agenda. The Center’s main audience is the Washington insiders – policy-oriented legislators, presidential appointees, career civil servants in planning, evaluation and budget offices, congressional committee staff, engaged academics, and interest group analysts – who together decide the pace and direction of policy change. Follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/NiskanenCenter Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/niskanencenter/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Institute of Public Affairs

2/410 Collins St, MELBOURNE, VIC, AU, 3000
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://ipa.org.au

The Institute of Public Affairs is an independent, non-profit public policy think tank, dedicated to preserving and strengthening the foundations of economic and political freedom. Since 1943, the IPA has been at the forefront of the political and policy debate, defining the contemporary political landscape. The IPA is funded by individual memberships and subscriptions, as well as philanthropic and corporate donors. The IPA supports the free market of ideas, the free flow of capital, a limited and efficient government, evidence-based public policy, the rule of law, and representative democracy. Throughout human history, these ideas have proven themselves to be the most dynamic, liberating and exciting. Our researchers apply these ideas to the public policy questions which matter today. The IPA's specific research areas include the environment, deregulation, workplace relations, energy, political governance, intellectual property, telecommunications, technology, housing, education, health and agriculture. The IPA publishes a wide variety of research papers and supporting opinion pieces, as well as host conferences and lectures across the country. The IPA also publishes the IPA Review, Australia's longest running political magazine. In 2008, the IPA Review was awarded the Sir Anthony Fisher Memorial Award for best magazine.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-institute-of-public-affairs.jpeg
The Institute of Public Affairs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Niskanen Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Institute of Public Affairs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niskanen Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Institute of Public Affairs in 2025.

Incident History — Niskanen Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niskanen Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Institute of Public Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Institute of Public Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-institute-of-public-affairs.jpeg
The Institute of Public Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Niskanen Center company and The Institute of Public Affairs company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Institute of Public Affairs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Niskanen Center company.

In the current year, The Institute of Public Affairs company and Niskanen Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Institute of Public Affairs company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Institute of Public Affairs company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Institute of Public Affairs company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor The Institute of Public Affairs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center nor The Institute of Public Affairs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor The Institute of Public Affairs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Niskanen Center company employs more people globally than The Institute of Public Affairs company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Niskanen Center nor The Institute of Public Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor The Institute of Public Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor The Institute of Public Affairs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor The Institute of Public Affairs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor The Institute of Public Affairs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor The Institute of Public Affairs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References