Comparison Overview

Niskanen Center

VS

Environmental Law Institute

Niskanen Center

820 1st Street NE, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Established in 2014, the Niskanen Center is a nonpartisan think tank that works to change public policy through direct engagement in the policymaking process: developing and promoting proposals to legislative and executive branch policymakers, building coalitions to facilitate joint action, and marshaling the most convincing arguments in support of our agenda. The Center’s main audience is the Washington insiders – policy-oriented legislators, presidential appointees, career civil servants in planning, evaluation and budget offices, congressional committee staff, engaged academics, and interest group analysts – who together decide the pace and direction of policy change. Follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/NiskanenCenter Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/niskanencenter/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Environmental Law Institute

1730 M Street NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Environmental Law Institute (ELI) makes law work for people, places, and the planet. Since 1969, ELI has played a pivotal role in shaping the fields of environmental law, policy, and management, domestically and abroad. Today, we enter our fifth decade as an internationally recognized, non-partisan research and education center working to strengthen environmental protection by improving law and governance worldwide. ELI conducts research on a broad spectrum of issues, producing reports and offering policy recommendations on critical areas of environmental governance here in the United States as well as abroad. Capacity building programs for public officials, judges, citizens, and factory managers are a large part of ELI’s agenda. ELI educates and builds bridges among the various environmental stakeholders through our Membership Program, which convenes environmental professionals from all sectors and offers seminars on timely topics presented by leading experts and practitioners. ELI also advances innovative and pragmatic solutions to today's environmental challenges through various publications, including the The Environmental Forum®, ELR-The Environmental Law Reporter®, and ELI Press, our book division.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/environmental-law-institute.jpeg
Environmental Law Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Niskanen Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Environmental Law Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niskanen Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Environmental Law Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Niskanen Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niskanen Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Environmental Law Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Environmental Law Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/environmental-law-institute.jpeg
Environmental Law Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Environmental Law Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Niskanen Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Environmental Law Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Niskanen Center company.

In the current year, Environmental Law Institute company and Niskanen Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Environmental Law Institute company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Environmental Law Institute company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Environmental Law Institute company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor Environmental Law Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Environmental Law Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor Environmental Law Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Environmental Law Institute company employs more people globally than Niskanen Center company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Environmental Law Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Environmental Law Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Environmental Law Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Environmental Law Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Environmental Law Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Niskanen Center nor Environmental Law Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X