Comparison Overview

Nimax

VS

Safehouse Signs, Inc.

Nimax

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nimax.nl

Printing company of specialist flexible packaging, located in the east of Nederland in Elst Gld. Nimax has small web flexo and rotogravure presses with additional features like embossing, slitting, die cutting. We serve the tobacco market with innerliners, the tea market with a variaty of tags and envelopes and produce bands for the embroidery yarn industry. Supply world wide.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Safehouse Signs, Inc.

720 Liberty Road NE, Roanoke, VA, 24012, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.safehousesigns.com

Headquartered in Roanoke, VA, Safehouse Signs Inc. has been a leading manufacturer of safety identification signs and products for over 40 years. Our relentless commitment to invest in the best people, processes and technology gives our distributor partners and unparalleled competitive advantage. With one of the largest selections of stock products and limitless custom options, Safehouse Signs has your identification needs covered.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nimax
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safehouse-signs-inc-.jpeg
Safehouse Signs, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nimax
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Safehouse Signs, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nimax in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safehouse Signs, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Nimax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nimax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Safehouse Signs, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safehouse Signs, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nimax
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safehouse-signs-inc-.jpeg
Safehouse Signs, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nimax company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Safehouse Signs, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Safehouse Signs, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nimax company.

In the current year, Safehouse Signs, Inc. company and Nimax company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Safehouse Signs, Inc. company nor Nimax company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Safehouse Signs, Inc. company nor Nimax company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Safehouse Signs, Inc. company nor Nimax company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nimax company nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nimax nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nimax company nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Safehouse Signs, Inc. company employs more people globally than Nimax company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Nimax nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nimax nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nimax nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nimax nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nimax nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nimax nor Safehouse Signs, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References