Comparison Overview

Nielsen Design Group

VS

The Kind Design

Nielsen Design Group

49684, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Nielsen Design Group, Inc., is respected regionally as a communication design consultancy. Since 1982 and prior, we have specialized exclusively, in corporate identity and communication systems design and implementation. Since our founding in 1982, our focus has been to help clients in the business, institutional and non-profit sectors to accomplish the key business objectives that define success, with branding that results in: Securing or creating an industry lead with strengthened branding that serves notice and garners new respect; Clearing up confusion in a market space, about what a institution’s brand stands for today, as distinct from yesterday; Improving the perceived value of a program, product or service in the light of new business objectives or market trends; Entering new markets confidently with branding that holds its own in a national or global space. We offer expertise 3 ways: 1) We create unique and memorable brand identities from scratch; 2) We evolve existing brand identities that leverage the best of current brand equity; 3) We apply either of the two brand identities above, to communication systems that ensure unified and consistent brand strategy across all media.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Kind Design

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Quick Design Service ~ Print and Online ~ Creative, award winning Graphic Designer with more than 14 years of experience in marketing, online and print design. I'm passionate about using excellent design to attract the desired demographic; I would love to create high-end designs for YOU: online, magazines or newspaper, as well as brochures, flyers and posters.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nielsen Design Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-kind-design.jpeg
The Kind Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nielsen Design Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Kind Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nielsen Design Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Kind Design in 2025.

Incident History — Nielsen Design Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nielsen Design Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Kind Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Kind Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nielsen Design Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-kind-design.jpeg
The Kind Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nielsen Design Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Kind Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Kind Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nielsen Design Group company.

In the current year, The Kind Design company and Nielsen Design Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Kind Design company nor Nielsen Design Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Kind Design company nor Nielsen Design Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Kind Design company nor Nielsen Design Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nielsen Design Group company nor The Kind Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nielsen Design Group nor The Kind Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nielsen Design Group company nor The Kind Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nielsen Design Group company employs more people globally than The Kind Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Nielsen Design Group nor The Kind Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nielsen Design Group nor The Kind Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nielsen Design Group nor The Kind Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nielsen Design Group nor The Kind Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nielsen Design Group nor The Kind Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nielsen Design Group nor The Kind Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X