Comparison Overview

Nicira

VS

Network Dynamics

Nicira

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Nicira is the network virtualization company. Nicira’s Network Virtualization Platform (NVP) enables the dynamic creation of virtual network infrastructure and services that are completely decoupled and independent from the physical network hardware. Innovative companies such as AT&T, eBay, Fidelity Investments, NTT and Rackspace are using Nicira NVP to accelerate service delivery from weeks to minutes and dramatically reduce complexity and cost. For more information, please visit www.nicira.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Network Dynamics

700 Brooker Creek Blvd., Suite 1000, Oldsmar, Florida, US, 34677
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Network Dynamics, Inc.(NDI), now a Global Convergence, Inc. company founded in 1994 is a privately held professional and managed service provider focused on the Fortune 1000. Network Dynamics provides complete private label service and support programs including staging, implementation, remote and onsite management, spares and logistics support, 24x365 customer facing TAC support with onsite parts and labor. Network Dynamics is a services delivery engine offering worldwide single point of contact support for multi-vendor, multi-site, legacy and emerging IP communications technology. Responsible for strategic business development with service providers, OEMs, distributors, and independent service networks seeking to create or augment private label branded service and support programs. Network Dynamics is a Cisco Gold Partner Channel Partner.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 90
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicira.jpeg
Nicira
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-dynamics.jpeg
Network Dynamics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nicira
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Network Dynamics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nicira in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network Dynamics in 2025.

Incident History — Nicira (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nicira cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Network Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicira.jpeg
Nicira
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-dynamics.jpeg
Network Dynamics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Nicira company and Network Dynamics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Network Dynamics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nicira company.

In the current year, Network Dynamics company and Nicira company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Network Dynamics company nor Nicira company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Network Dynamics company nor Nicira company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Network Dynamics company nor Nicira company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nicira company nor Network Dynamics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nicira nor Network Dynamics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Network Dynamics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nicira company.

Network Dynamics company employs more people globally than Nicira company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Nicira nor Network Dynamics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nicira nor Network Dynamics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nicira nor Network Dynamics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nicira nor Network Dynamics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nicira nor Network Dynamics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nicira nor Network Dynamics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.