Comparison Overview

Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP

VS

RWS inovia

Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP

99 Almaden Blvd., Suite 575, San Jose, CA, 95113-1605, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are a boutique intellectual property law firm based in Silicon Valley, representing innovators from small startups to multinational technology giants. Our team of distinguished patent practitioners keeps our clients in the vanguard of technological developments. We are proud to offer our knowledge and experience in patent law for the benefit of our clients, while also maintaining the highest ethical standards for patent law professionals. Find out more about us at www.ndwe.com

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RWS inovia

30 Broad Street, New York, NY, 10004, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

RWS inovia is the world’s leading expert in IP translations, foreign patent filing and patent search services. For more than 50 years, we have led the industry and helped more than 10,000 clients protect their intellectual property and enforce their IP rights around the world. With offices worldwide in Europe, North America and APAC, RWS Group employs more than 850 staff. Learn more at www.rws.com and www.inovia.com.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicholson-de-vos-webster-&-elliott-llp.jpeg
Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inovia_2.jpeg
RWS inovia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RWS inovia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RWS inovia in 2025.

Incident History — Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RWS inovia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RWS inovia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicholson-de-vos-webster-&-elliott-llp.jpeg
Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inovia_2.jpeg
RWS inovia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RWS inovia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RWS inovia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company.

In the current year, RWS inovia company and Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RWS inovia company nor Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RWS inovia company nor Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RWS inovia company nor Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company nor RWS inovia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP nor RWS inovia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company nor RWS inovia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP company employs more people globally than RWS inovia company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP nor RWS inovia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP nor RWS inovia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP nor RWS inovia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP nor RWS inovia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP nor RWS inovia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP nor RWS inovia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X