Comparison Overview

Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd

VS

Edenwald Senior Living

Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd

30 Station Road , Orpington, BR6 0SA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

Nicholas James Care Homes is a group of 11 family run care homes situated across the South-East of England in the Kent and Sussex area. As a multi-award-winning care home provider, our heritage is rooted in compassion, care, and community. Named after the founder’s sons, the heart of Nicholas James Care Homes is centred around family. This ethos extends beyond our ownership to include our dedicated staff and beloved residents, whom we consider part of our extended family. In 2015, Nicholas James Care Homes joined our sister company, Regal Care, under shared family leadership, reinforcing our commitment to ‘Caring through Generations’.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Edenwald Senior Living

800 Southerly Road, Towson, MD, 21286, US
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

Edenwald is a premier retirement community that offers a lifestyle beyond compare. With all the amenities available within our community and the countless activities, resources, and attractions available in Towson and the surrounding area, Edenwald residents engage life fully. Our commitment to our residents’ needs is visible through the wide range of services provided. Residents can run their daily errands without leaving home—pick up milk or eggs at the on-site convenience store, stop in at the on-site Columbia Bank to make a deposit, or invite friends for a fabulous meal at one of Edenwald’s restaurants. Those who choose to live at Edenwald are attracted to the thriving Towson neighborhood and the vast array of cultural, recreational, educational, and civic activities nearby and in the surrounding Baltimore-Washington area.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicholas-james-care-homes-ltd.jpeg
Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edenwald-retirement-community.jpeg
Edenwald Senior Living
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edenwald Senior Living
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edenwald Senior Living in 2025.

Incident History — Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edenwald Senior Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edenwald Senior Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicholas-james-care-homes-ltd.jpeg
Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edenwald-retirement-community.jpeg
Edenwald Senior Living
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Edenwald Senior Living company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Edenwald Senior Living company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company.

In the current year, Edenwald Senior Living company and Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living company nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living company nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Edenwald Senior Living company nor Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company nor Edenwald Senior Living company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd nor Edenwald Senior Living holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company nor Edenwald Senior Living company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Edenwald Senior Living company employs more people globally than Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd nor Edenwald Senior Living holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd nor Edenwald Senior Living holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd nor Edenwald Senior Living holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd nor Edenwald Senior Living holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd nor Edenwald Senior Living holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd nor Edenwald Senior Living holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N