Comparison Overview

Nicer Collaborative

VS

Hollie Would Design

Nicer Collaborative

1361 N Ashland Ave, Chicago, 60622, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Nicer Collaborative is a creative studio located in Chicago. Our principle areas of expertise are brand identity, web application development and graphic design. We work intimately with our clients to research the problems and goals we are presented with so we may develop creative solutions—ultimately bringing their business to life and translating their uniqueness to their desired audience. Our dedication to truly getting to know our clients results in a level of customer service and friendliness that make up the core principle of who we are and what we do—nicer people, nicer work.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hollie Would Design

undefined, Dallas, Texas, 75077, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

I provide a customized, personal experience for all of my clients. I’m all about creating a partnership to give you the tools you need to run your business (and look great doing it!). You will be guided step-by-step through the design process, allowing you to focus on your business and let me worry about the design details. Let’s build a brand that you’re proud of! BRAND/PRINT: ✔️ Ad Design ✔️ Marketing Materials ✔️ Business Cards ✔️ Presentation Design ✔️ Trade Show Booths ✔️ Packaging ✔️ And More! WEB: ✔️ Email Newsletter Design ✔️ Social Media Post Design ✔️ Photo Editing / Manipulation ✔️ Full Web Design ✔️ Landing Page Design ✔️ Banners & Ads ✔️ Social Media Assets ✔️ Ecommerce ✔️ Plugin Integrations ✔️ App Design ✔️ Mobile Responsive Websites ✔️ And More!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicer-collaborative.jpeg
Nicer Collaborative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollie-would-design.jpeg
Hollie Would Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nicer Collaborative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hollie Would Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nicer Collaborative in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hollie Would Design in 2025.

Incident History — Nicer Collaborative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nicer Collaborative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hollie Would Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hollie Would Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nicer-collaborative.jpeg
Nicer Collaborative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollie-would-design.jpeg
Hollie Would Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hollie Would Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nicer Collaborative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hollie Would Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nicer Collaborative company.

In the current year, Hollie Would Design company and Nicer Collaborative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hollie Would Design company nor Nicer Collaborative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hollie Would Design company nor Nicer Collaborative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hollie Would Design company nor Nicer Collaborative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nicer Collaborative company nor Hollie Would Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nicer Collaborative nor Hollie Would Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nicer Collaborative company nor Hollie Would Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nicer Collaborative company employs more people globally than Hollie Would Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Nicer Collaborative nor Hollie Would Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nicer Collaborative nor Hollie Would Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nicer Collaborative nor Hollie Would Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nicer Collaborative nor Hollie Would Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nicer Collaborative nor Hollie Would Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nicer Collaborative nor Hollie Would Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X