Comparison Overview

Niabi Zoo

VS

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

Niabi Zoo

13010 Niabi Zoo Road, Coal Valley, 61240, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.niabizoo.com

Located in Coal Valley, IL, Niabi Zoo offers an opportunity to explore 40 acres of a 287-acre forest preserve while enjoying the countryside of Rock Island County. This exploration guides guests through the discovery of more than 600 animals representing over 200 biologically diverse species. With its dynamic education programs and unique guest experiences, the Zoo also provides superb animal care for 25 species that are endangered, vulnerable and threatened with extinction. Niabi is the at the forefront of conservation of species and habitats through local efforts as well as supporting conservation partners from around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

Port Arthur Historic Site, Arthur Highway, Port Arthur, Tasmania, AU, 7182
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.portarthur.org.au

Port Arthur Historic Site is a special place of vivid history, cultural heritage and stories so compelling, you’ll want to hear them again and again. It’s a place of global significance – one of the 11 places that make up the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Australian Convict Sites. And it’s one of Australia’s favourite tourist destinations. Cascades Female Factory Historic Site aims to foster a greater understanding and appreciation for the largely untold story of female convicts sent to Australia. Cascades Female Factory Historic Site is the most significant site associated with female convicts in Australia, it is listed as one of the 11 sites that together form the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property, inscribed on the World Heritage list in 2010. The Coal Mines Historic Site is an outstanding example of the 19th-century European global strategy of using the forced labour of convicts. Illustrating the importance of labour and production, classification, punishment and surveillance in the penal system and the role of the convict in the establishment of colonial economies, the Coal Mines Historic Site is listed as one of the 11 sites that together form the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property, inscribed on the World Heritage list in 2010.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niabi-zoo.jpeg
Niabi Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-arthur-historic-site-management-authority.jpeg
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Niabi Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niabi Zoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority in 2025.

Incident History — Niabi Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niabi Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niabi-zoo.jpeg
Niabi Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-arthur-historic-site-management-authority.jpeg
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Niabi Zoo company and Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Niabi Zoo company.

In the current year, Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company and Niabi Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company nor Niabi Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company nor Niabi Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company nor Niabi Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Niabi Zoo company nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Niabi Zoo nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Niabi Zoo company.

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company employs more people globally than Niabi Zoo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Niabi Zoo nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Niabi Zoo nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Niabi Zoo nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Niabi Zoo nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Niabi Zoo nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Niabi Zoo nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References