Comparison Overview

NHG Health

VS

NHS

NHG Health

3 Fusionopolis Link, #03-08, Nexus@one-north (South Lobby), Singapore, SG, 138543
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

NHG Health is a leading public healthcare provider in Singapore recognised for its quality clinical care and its commitment in enabling healthier lives through preventive health, innovative solutions and person-centred programmes tailored to every life stage. Our integrated health system, which spans primary care, hospitals and national specialty centres, includes Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Woodlands Health, Yishun Community Hospital, NHG Polyclinics, the Institute of Mental Health, National Skin Centre and the National Centre for Infectious Diseases. Together with academic and industry partners, we advance medical education, research and healthcare innovation in Singapore, addressing areas that are critical to Singapore’s population needs. As the Regional Health Manager for Central and North Singapore, NHG Health partners general practices and health and social care agencies to ensure the physical, mental and social well-being of residents in the community. Together, we are committed to building healthier and resilient communities, and Adding Years of Healthy Life to the people we serve. More information at www.nhghealth.com.sg.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,683
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NHS

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 650 and 699

The NHS was launched in 1948. It was born out of a long-held ideal that good healthcare should be available to all, regardless of wealth – one of the NHS's core principles. With the exception of some charges, such as prescriptions, optical services and dental services, the NHS in England remains free at the point of use for all UK residents. This currently stands at more than 64.6 million people in the UK and 54.3 million people in England alone. The NHS in England deals with over 1 million patients every 36 hours. It covers everything, including antenatal screening, routine screenings (such as the NHS Health Check), treatments for long-term conditions, transplants, emergency treatment and end-of-life care. Responsibility for healthcare in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales is devolved to the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Government and the Welsh Assembly Government respectively. The NHS employs more than 1.5 million people, putting it in the top five of the world’s largest workforces, together with the US Department of Defence, McDonalds, Walmart and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. The NHS in England is the biggest part of the system by far, catering to a population of 54.3 million and employing around 1.2 million people. Of those, the clinically qualified staff include 150,273 doctors, 40,584 general practitioners (GPs), 314,966 nurses and health visitors, 18,862 ambulance staff, and 111,127 hospital and community health service (HCHS) medical and dental staff. The NHS in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland employs 161,415; 84,000 and 66,000 people respectively.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 238,427
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhghealth.jpeg
NHG Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhs.jpeg
NHS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NHG Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NHS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NHG Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

NHS has 19.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — NHG Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NHG Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NHS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NHS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhghealth.jpeg
NHG Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhs.jpeg
NHS
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Oracle software vulnerability
Motivation: Financial gain, data exfiltration, reputational damage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Hidden Monitoring Feature
Motivation: Data Collection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NHG Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NHS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NHS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NHG Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, NHS company has reported more cyber incidents than NHG Health company.

NHS company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while NHG Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NHS company nor NHG Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

NHS company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while NHG Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NHG Health company nor NHS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NHG Health nor NHS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NHG Health company nor NHS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NHS company employs more people globally than NHG Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither NHG Health nor NHS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NHG Health nor NHS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NHG Health nor NHS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NHG Health nor NHS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NHG Health nor NHS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NHG Health nor NHS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N