Comparison Overview

NGUYEN TARBET IP Law

VS

Keller Preece

NGUYEN TARBET IP Law

2474 E River Rd, Tucson, Arizona, 85718, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

NGUYEN TARBET IP Law is a powerhouse in patent procurement. Further, we provide a full suite of IP services, such as patentability analysis, strategic planning, patent portfolio management, due diligence investigations, patent re-examinations, legal opinions (patent validity, infringement, freedom to operate), trademark clearance analysis, trademark registration, and trademark opposition/cancellation petitions. Patent Attorneys and Advisors at NGUYEN TARBET IP Law are highly skilled patent professionals with advanced degrees in Science and Engineering. Quan Nguyen and Ken Tarbet (1961-2016) founded the firm in 2008, on the core principle of providing exceptional Intellectual Property (IP) services with integrity and aggressive protection of our clients’ interests. In close collaboration with our clients, we have achieved numerous successes over the years. We are proud of our legacy and we continue to work hard everyday to get results.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Keller Preece

1010 North 500 East, North Salt Lake, Utah, 84054, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Keller Jolley Preece was founded on the principal of combining accomplished and driven IP attorneys with an entrepreneurial work ethic of a Silicon Valley start-up. Bringing a broad perspective gained from years of patent prosecution, IP litigation, and in-house counsel experience, KJP specializes in securing intellectual property that meets the challenging needs of its clients. At KJP, we understand your technology and care about its protection as much as you do. Whether managing social media patent portfolios for Facebook, prosecuting patents for Fortune 500 companies, or helping the next great start-up protect its initial innovations, KJP is relied on for responsive, efficient professionalism, and most of all, results.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nguyen-&-tarbet-llc.jpeg
NGUYEN TARBET IP Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-jolley-preece.jpeg
Keller Preece
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NGUYEN TARBET IP Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Keller Preece
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NGUYEN TARBET IP Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Preece in 2025.

Incident History — NGUYEN TARBET IP Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NGUYEN TARBET IP Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Keller Preece (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Preece cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nguyen-&-tarbet-llc.jpeg
NGUYEN TARBET IP Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-jolley-preece.jpeg
Keller Preece
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Keller Preece company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Keller Preece company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company.

In the current year, Keller Preece company and NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Keller Preece company nor NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Keller Preece company nor NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Keller Preece company nor NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company nor Keller Preece company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law nor Keller Preece holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company nor Keller Preece company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Keller Preece company employs more people globally than NGUYEN TARBET IP Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law nor Keller Preece holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law nor Keller Preece holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law nor Keller Preece holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law nor Keller Preece holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law nor Keller Preece holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NGUYEN TARBET IP Law nor Keller Preece holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X