Comparison Overview

Neyenesch Printers, Inc.

VS

Kalas Packaging Limited

Neyenesch Printers, Inc.

2750 Kettner Blvd, San Diego, 92101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Simply put, we are printers. Started in 1899 and still family owned and operated, Neyenesch has spent the last century or so learning all there is to know about the art of printing. And we use this expertise daily. We use well-respected industry surveys of customer satisfaction. Our results have always scored in the top 10% of all printing companies in America. Our business has evolved to provide what our client’s covet most–expertise, attention to detail, variety of services, environmentally conscious practices, and competitive pricing. We believe that our satisfied clients and successful growth in our market and beyond speak volumes. But we invite you to read on about our approach to printing, and to contact us so that we can help make your printing project the best it can be.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kalas Packaging Limited

11 Haven Business Park, Boston, England, PE21 7AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

LIMITLESS PRINT SOLUTIONS Digital and Lithographic printing at our site in Boston, Lincolnshire. UK manufacturer of horticultural labels and now a leading digital carton producer with our HP Indigo 30000 press. Our key products which are all manufactured in house include folding box board cartons, sleeves, pillow packs, cake collars, labels and a range of unique gift packaging products. Our fast, flexible turnaround times offer our customers across many different industry sectors with a complete print on demand solution. BRC Food Hygiene accredited and FSC certification. Think unique packaging. Think Kalas Packaging. For enquires please contact: [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neyenesch-printers.jpeg
Neyenesch Printers, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kalas-packaging.jpeg
Kalas Packaging Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neyenesch Printers, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kalas Packaging Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neyenesch Printers, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kalas Packaging Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Neyenesch Printers, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neyenesch Printers, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kalas Packaging Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kalas Packaging Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neyenesch-printers.jpeg
Neyenesch Printers, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kalas-packaging.jpeg
Kalas Packaging Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kalas Packaging Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kalas Packaging Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company.

In the current year, Kalas Packaging Limited company and Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kalas Packaging Limited company nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kalas Packaging Limited company nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kalas Packaging Limited company nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company nor Kalas Packaging Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. nor Kalas Packaging Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company nor Kalas Packaging Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company employs more people globally than Kalas Packaging Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. nor Kalas Packaging Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. nor Kalas Packaging Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. nor Kalas Packaging Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. nor Kalas Packaging Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. nor Kalas Packaging Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. nor Kalas Packaging Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N