Comparison Overview

Next GenTech

VS

Meta

Next GenTech

IN
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://nextzt.com/

At NexT GenTech , We have combined all of our creative backgrounds to produce an experience designed for your specific needs. Our products are designed to be future ready and that elevate the mobile experience to the next level. Being innovative to us means simplifying technology to create easy to adopt solutions that address industry pain points. We understand your concerns regarding the data, so we are more focused in providing our products by building them with end-to-end encryption to provide a better companionship with best experience. We focus on turning insights into ideas that can be taken to execution quickly, and always committed in pioneering our products as per today’s industry that was fast moving towards mobile and wireless technology.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Meta

1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 700 and 749
https://www.metacareers.com/

Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. To help create a safe and respectful online space, we encourage constructive conversations on this page. Please note the following: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. Please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit https://www.metacareers.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 146,293
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Next GenTech
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next GenTech in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Meta has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Next GenTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next GenTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nextgentech.jpeg
Next GenTech
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Email
Motivation: Identity Fraud, Data Theft, Scam Distribution
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: API Vulnerability Exploitation, Third-Party Scraping
Motivation: Data Exfiltration for Financial Gain, Identity Theft, Phishing Campaigns
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unsafe deserialization of payloads
Motivation: Exploitation for remote code execution, potential data exfiltration, and botnet integration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Next GenTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meta company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Meta company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Next GenTech company.

In the current year, Meta company has reported more cyber incidents than Next GenTech company.

Neither Meta company nor Next GenTech company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Meta company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Next GenTech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Next GenTech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Next GenTech company and Meta company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Next GenTech nor Meta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Meta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Next GenTech company.

Neither Next GenTech nor Meta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Next GenTech nor Meta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Next GenTech nor Meta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Next GenTech nor Meta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Next GenTech nor Meta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Next GenTech nor Meta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References