Comparison Overview

Next Printing

VS

Colorfx

Next Printing

3-5/2 Burrrows Rd South, St Peters, NSW, 2044, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Imagine a world where there are no limits on what you can create. Where any idea can become a masterpiece; where you are guided through every step. Welcome to Next Printing – where an artwork becomes a masterpiece. Next is Australia's leading large format digital printing company — your destination for exceptional colour, innovative print materials and unmatched graphic solutions. Our commitment to quality customer service and investment in the latest digital technology combines with our years of experience to transform your next artwork into a work of art.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Colorfx

10776 Aurora Ave., Des Moines, 50322, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Colorfx we set the bar high. We have mastered the art of putting ink on paper, so creative ideas fly off the page to capture your customers'​ imagination and their business. We understand how important it is that your project is handled professionally and accurately, and that it is delivered on time. Our team draws on more than 30 years of commercial printing and marketing expertise as we partner with you to create, implement and execute creative marketing solutions. With our 240,000 square feet of commercial printing production capability, the most advanced printing technology available today, and 500 hardworking and dedicated employees in 4 different plants, Colorfx and Rock Communications provide you and your customers the services of a national printer from a Central Iowa printing company. Being centrally located in the Midwest enables us to reach your audiences across the country quickly and efficiently.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorfx.jpeg
Colorfx
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Next Printing
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colorfx
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorfx in 2025.

Incident History — Next Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colorfx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorfx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/next-printing.jpeg
Next Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorfx.jpeg
Colorfx
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Colorfx company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Next Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Colorfx company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Next Printing company.

In the current year, Colorfx company and Next Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colorfx company nor Next Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Colorfx company nor Next Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colorfx company nor Next Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Next Printing company nor Colorfx company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Next Printing nor Colorfx holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Next Printing company nor Colorfx company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colorfx company employs more people globally than Next Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Next Printing nor Colorfx holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Next Printing nor Colorfx holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Next Printing nor Colorfx holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Next Printing nor Colorfx holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Next Printing nor Colorfx holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Next Printing nor Colorfx holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N