Comparison Overview

Newman Printing Company, Inc.

VS

PCL Graphics

Newman Printing Company, Inc.

1300 E 29th Street, Bryan, Texas, 77802, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newmanprint.com

Since its inception, Newman Printing Company has focused on achieving superior results for its clients. Newman Printing Company is proud to be the only major Houston area printing firm to have operated under continuous single-family ownership for over six decades. Over the years, Newman Printing has remained at the forefront of the commercial printing industry through the continuous enhancement of the company’s printing equipment and technology. All of this was done in line with one of the guiding principles of our founder, Louis M. Newman, Jr. who said “good people and good equipment make their own market in the printing industry.” Newman Printing Company has always prided itself in having the best people and the best equipment. Our continued growth has placed us among the twenty largest printers in the Houston area. Our work has received hundreds of awards for print quality on local, state, national and international levels. Newman Printing Company is a Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) and has received HUB Certification.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PCL Graphics

55 Clegg Rd, Markham, L6G 1B9, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pclgraphics.com

PCL Graphics has been creating and designing wide format signage for both Domestic and International markets for more than 35 years. As it is well known, the past 20 decades have been revolutionary in the fields of science and technology, changing the fabric of many industries. Signage is no exception to this. The strength that has allowed PCL Graphics to become successful is our perseverance and our quality work.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newman-printing-company-inc..jpeg
Newman Printing Company, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcl-graphics.jpeg
PCL Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Newman Printing Company, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PCL Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newman Printing Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PCL Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Newman Printing Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newman Printing Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PCL Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PCL Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newman-printing-company-inc..jpeg
Newman Printing Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcl-graphics.jpeg
PCL Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Newman Printing Company, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PCL Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PCL Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Newman Printing Company, Inc. company.

In the current year, PCL Graphics company and Newman Printing Company, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PCL Graphics company nor Newman Printing Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PCL Graphics company nor Newman Printing Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PCL Graphics company nor Newman Printing Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. company nor PCL Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. nor PCL Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PCL Graphics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Newman Printing Company, Inc. company.

PCL Graphics company employs more people globally than Newman Printing Company, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. nor PCL Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. nor PCL Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. nor PCL Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. nor PCL Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. nor PCL Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Newman Printing Company, Inc. nor PCL Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References