Comparison Overview

NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER

VS

Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services

NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER

215 S POWER RD, MESA, 85206, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

New Hope Behavioral Health Center is an outpatient behavioral healthcare clinic that specializes in partnering with health care professionals to manage the very difficult and delicate task of withdrawing their opiate dependent patients. This is challenging, but rewarding work, and it enables you to distinguish between legitimate pain and induced pain associated with Withdrawal Syndrome. Generally, patients with legitimate pain are prescribed pain medication. Often times, managing these patients long term can be taxing and risky when the provider begins to feel as though the patient is drug-seeking. Ethically, it can be difficult to refuse to continue care...but what option do providers have? We at NEW HOPE are the option. Research indicates that every year nearly six million Americans use prescription opioid pain medication, and in some communities abuse prescription pain medication has overtaken cocaine and marijuana use. The 2002 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) showed that approximately 9% of the U.S. Population has used pain revilers illegally in their lifetime. An estimated 4.6 million Americans used prescription type pain medications non-medically for the first time in 1998. This represents a significant increase since the 1980's, where there were generally fewer than 50,000 new users per year. Today, approximately 75% of our patients suffer from a dependency on pain medications, whereas in years past dependencies to heroin were the most common. We recognize that all patents who are physically dependent on and physiologically addicted to prescription pain medication are a result of many imbalances that require expert medical treatment in a safe, humane and effective environment, encapsulated in confidentiality. Services Provided: Substance Abuse Treatment Detoxification Methadone Maintenance Methadone Detoxification Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/NewHopeMesaAZ/

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 750 and 799

Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services is committed to the delivery of the highest quality of service consistent with available resources. As part of the commitment, Rio Grande's leadership requires and supports the establishment and maintenance of an effective organization-wide program of performance improvement. It will be leadership's mission to make quality the responsibility of every one in the organization by promoting meaningful and real cooperation among health care professionals on all levels, especially across perceived barriers, such as provider and treatment boundaries. We live our mission by: Assessing and managing the care of those we serve in a caring, competent, compassionate and coordinated manner. Engaging in benchmarking and providing quality education to benefit the community. Providing services of quality and value by means of continuous improvement. Taking a leadership position in promoting health in the community. Collaborating with providers, community and other health care institutions in ways that improve health and enhance the overall value of behavioral health care delivered in Southern New Mexico. Nurturing an environment that values diversity, encourages personal growth and enhances the health-seeking behaviors of each individual. Providing a responsible influence in advocating and affecting positive change in health care delivery systems, including co-occurring and harm reduction activities. Taking a leadership position, guided by our values, to help resolve the ethical issues impacting health care and its delivery.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newhopemesaaz.jpeg
NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rio-grande-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services in 2026.

Incident History — NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newhopemesaaz.jpeg
NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rio-grande-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company.

In the current year, Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company and NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company nor NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company nor NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company nor NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER company employs more people globally than Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NEW HOPE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER nor Rio Grande Behavioral Health Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N