Comparison Overview

Newell Brands

VS

Prysmian

Newell Brands

6655 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30328, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Newell Brands (NASDAQ: NWL) is a leading global consumer goods company with a strong portfolio of well-known brands, including Rubbermaid, Sharpie, Graco, Coleman, Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Yankee Candle, Paper Mate, FoodSaver, Dymo, EXPO, Elmer’s, Oster, NUK, Spontex and Campingaz. We are focused on delighting consumers by lighting up everyday moments.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 14,255
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prysmian

Via Chiese 6, Milan, 20126, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Prysmian is a global cabling solutions provider leading the energy transition and digital transformation. By leveraging its wide geographical footprint and extensive product range, its track record of technological leadership and innovation, and a strong customer base, the company is well-placed to capitalise on its leading positions and win in new, growing markets. Prysmian’s business strategy perfectly matches key market drivers by developing resilient, high-performing, sustainable and innovative cable solutions in the segments of Transmission, Power Grid, Electrification and Digital Solutions. Prysmian is a public company listed on the Italian Stock Exchange, with almost 150 years of experience, over 33,000 employees, 109 plants and 27 R&D centres in over 50 countries, and sales of over €15 billion in 2023.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 14,379
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newellbrands.jpeg
Newell Brands
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prysmian.jpeg
Prysmian
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Newell Brands
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prysmian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newell Brands in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prysmian in 2025.

Incident History — Newell Brands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newell Brands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prysmian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prysmian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newellbrands.jpeg
Newell Brands
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prysmian.jpeg
Prysmian
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Prysmian company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newell Brands company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prysmian company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Newell Brands company.

In the current year, Prysmian company and Newell Brands company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prysmian company nor Newell Brands company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prysmian company nor Newell Brands company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prysmian company nor Newell Brands company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Newell Brands company nor Prysmian company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Newell Brands nor Prysmian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Newell Brands company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Prysmian company.

Prysmian company employs more people globally than Newell Brands company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Newell Brands nor Prysmian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Prysmian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Prysmian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Prysmian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Prysmian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Prysmian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X