Comparison Overview

Newcastle Castle

VS

Coastal Heritage Society

Newcastle Castle

Castle Garth, NE1 1RQ, Tyne and Wear NE1 1RQ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newcastlecastle.co.uk

Reimagine your event with Newcastle Castle. This Norman Fortress is the perfect place for your one of a kind event - from weddings to walking tours, meeting spaces to medieval taverns, Newcastle Castle has everything for an occasion to remember. Email [email protected] to receive our corporate brochure for more information about everything we offer.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Coastal Heritage Society

undefined, undefined, undefined, 31401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.chsgeorgia.org

The mission of Coastal Heritage Society is to provide educational experiences for the public through the preservation and presentation of the historic resources of coastal Georgia and adjacent regions. Coastal Heritage Society is a 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation founded in 1975 which operates six historic museums for you to explore and special events to immerse you in our unique culture! Perfect for adults, families, and more. Coastal Heritage Society manages two National Historic Landmark sites and four museums. Coastal Heritage Society's Tricentennial Park campus is located on the west side of downtown Savannah, and is comprised of Savannah History Museum & Battlefield Memorial Park, Georgia State Railroad Museum, and Savannah Children's Museum. Coastal Heritage Society also manages Old Fort Jackson, a historic fort located on the Savannah River three miles east of downtown Savannah, Pin Point Heritage Museum, located off of the Diamond Causeway in southeast Savannah, and Harper Fowlkes House, located downtown on Orleans Square.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newcastle-castle.jpeg
Newcastle Castle
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coastal-heritage-society.jpeg
Coastal Heritage Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Newcastle Castle
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coastal Heritage Society
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newcastle Castle in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coastal Heritage Society in 2026.

Incident History — Newcastle Castle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newcastle Castle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coastal Heritage Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coastal Heritage Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newcastle-castle.jpeg
Newcastle Castle
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coastal-heritage-society.jpeg
Coastal Heritage Society
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coastal Heritage Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newcastle Castle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Coastal Heritage Society company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Newcastle Castle company.

In the current year, Coastal Heritage Society company and Newcastle Castle company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coastal Heritage Society company nor Newcastle Castle company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coastal Heritage Society company nor Newcastle Castle company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coastal Heritage Society company nor Newcastle Castle company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Newcastle Castle company nor Coastal Heritage Society company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Newcastle Castle nor Coastal Heritage Society holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Newcastle Castle company nor Coastal Heritage Society company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Coastal Heritage Society company employs more people globally than Newcastle Castle company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Newcastle Castle nor Coastal Heritage Society holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Newcastle Castle nor Coastal Heritage Society holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Newcastle Castle nor Coastal Heritage Society holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Newcastle Castle nor Coastal Heritage Society holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Newcastle Castle nor Coastal Heritage Society holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Newcastle Castle nor Coastal Heritage Society holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References