Comparison Overview

New York University

VS

The University of Texas at Austin

New York University

70 Washington Sq South, New York, NY, US, 10012-1091
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1831, NYU is one of the world’s foremost research universities and is a member of the selective Association of American Universities. The first Global Network University, NYU has degree-granting university campuses in New York and Abu Dhabi, and has announced a third in Shanghai; has a dozen other global academic sites, including London, Paris, Florence, Tel Aviv, Buenos Aires, and Accra; and sends more students to study abroad than any other U.S. college or university. Through its numerous schools and colleges, NYU conducts research and provides education in the arts and sciences, law, medicine, business, dentistry, education, nursing, the cinematic and performing arts, music and studio arts, public administration, social work, and continuing and professional studies, among other areas.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 25,592
Subsidiaries: 25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

The University of Texas at Austin

1 University Station, Austin, TX, US, 78712
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 800 and 849

The University of Texas at Austin is one of the largest public universities in the United States. Founded in 1883, the University has grown from a single building, eight teachers, two departments and 221 students to a 350-acre main campus with 21,000 faculty and staff, 16 colleges and schools and more than 50,000 students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 25,878
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-university.jpeg
New York University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theuniversityoftexasataustin-.jpeg
The University of Texas at Austin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New York University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The University of Texas at Austin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York University in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas at Austin in 2025.

Incident History — New York University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The University of Texas at Austin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas at Austin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-university.jpeg
New York University
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/1989
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Defacement
Motivation: Response to a Supreme Court decision on affirmative action
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theuniversityoftexasataustin-.jpeg
The University of Texas at Austin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The University of Texas at Austin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New York University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

New York University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The University of Texas at Austin company has not reported any.

In the current year, The University of Texas at Austin company and New York University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin company nor New York University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

New York University company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The University of Texas at Austin company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The University of Texas at Austin company nor New York University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New York University company nor The University of Texas at Austin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New York University nor The University of Texas at Austin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

New York University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The University of Texas at Austin company.

The University of Texas at Austin company employs more people globally than New York University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither New York University nor The University of Texas at Austin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New York University nor The University of Texas at Austin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New York University nor The University of Texas at Austin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New York University nor The University of Texas at Austin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New York University nor The University of Texas at Austin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New York University nor The University of Texas at Austin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H