Comparison Overview

New York City Police Department

VS

GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA

New York City Police Department

One Police Plaza, New York, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 700 and 749

Welcome to the Official NYPD LinkedIn Page. For emergencies, dial 911. To submit crime tips & information, visit www.NYPDcrimestoppers.com or call 800-577-TIPS. The mission of the New York City Police Department is to enhance the quality of life in New York City by working in partnership with the community to enforce the law, preserve peace, protect the people, reduce fear, and maintain order. The New York City Police Department strives to foster a safe and fair City by incorporating Neighborhood Policing into all facets of Department operations, and solve the problems that create crime and disorder through an interdependent relationship between the people and its police, and by pioneering strategic innovation.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 13,804
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA

None
Last Update: 2026-01-19

Gendarmería Nacional Argentina (GNA) es una Fuerza de Seguridad de naturaleza militar, que cumple funciones en la seguridad interior, defensa nacional, auxilio a la Justicia Federal y apoyo a la Política Exterior de la RA. Es una de las cuatro Fuerzas que integran el Ministerio de Seguridad de la Nación. Historia Durante la presidencia del Dr. Roberto M Ortiz, Gendarmería Nacional fue creada el 28 de julio del año 1938 por el Congreso Nacional. Las particularidades del territorio donde debía cumplir la misión y el carácter de ésta, determinaron que la Fuerza naciera como un Cuerpo con organización, formación militar y férrea disciplina, circunstancia que a la fecha se mantiene. Esa es la génesis de su creación y el espíritu que los legisladores imprimieron en el proyecto que luego fue promulgado como Ley Nº 12.367:“contribuir decididamente a mantener la identidad nacional en áreas limítrofes, a preservar el territorio nacional y la intangibilidad del límite internacional”. Su personal fue sujeto a un régimen disciplinario castrense, con estructura, capacitación, doctrina militar y formación jurídica que le permitiera cumplir funciones policiales en tiempo de paz, y en tiempo de guerra integrar el componente terrestre militar: Caso concreto, fue su participación en la Guerra de Malvinas en el año 1982. La institución se encuentra enmarcada dentro de la Ley Orgánica Nº 19.349 que regula su organización, misión, funciones, jurisdicción y competencias, como el régimen legal de su personal. #gendarmeria

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-police-department.jpeg
New York City Police Department
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gendarmeria-nacional-argentina.jpeg
GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New York City Police Department
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York City Police Department in 2026.

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA in 2026.

Incident History — New York City Police Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York City Police Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-police-department.jpeg
New York City Police Department
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Infected NUC mini-PC plugged in by a contractor
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gendarmeria-nacional-argentina.jpeg
GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New York City Police Department company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

New York City Police Department company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company has not reported any.

In the current year, GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company and New York City Police Department company have not reported any cyber incidents.

New York City Police Department company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company nor New York City Police Department company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company nor New York City Police Department company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New York City Police Department company nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New York City Police Department nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New York City Police Department company nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New York City Police Department company employs more people globally than GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA company, reflecting its scale as a Law Enforcement.

Neither New York City Police Department nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New York City Police Department nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New York City Police Department nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New York City Police Department nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New York City Police Department nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New York City Police Department nor GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N